Signal integration in chemoreceptor complexes.

Motile bacteria use large receptor arrays to detect chemical and physical stimuli in their environment, process this complex information, and accordingly bias their swimming in a direction they deem favorable. The chemoreceptor molecules form tripod-like trimers of receptor dimers through direct contacts between their cytoplasmic tips. A pair of trimers, together with a dedicated kinase enzyme, form a core signaling complex. Hundreds of core complexes network to form extended arrays. While considerable progress has been made in revealing the hierarchical structure of the array, the molecular properties underlying signal processing in these structures remain largely unclear. Here we analyzed the signaling properties of nonnetworked core complexes in live cells by following both conformational and kinase control responses to attractant stimuli and to output-biasing lesions at various locations in the receptor molecule. Contrary to the prevailing view that individual receptors are binary two-state devices, we demonstrate that conformational coupling between the ligand binding and the kinase-control receptor domains is, in fact, only moderate. In addition, we demonstrate communication between neighboring receptors through their trimer-contact domains that biases them to adopt similar signaling states. Taken together, these data suggest a view of signaling in receptor trimers that allows significant signal integration to occur within individual core complexes.

Attractant and repellent induce opposing changes in the four-helix bundle ligand-binding domain of a bacterial chemoreceptor.

Motile bacteria navigate toward favorable conditions and away from unfavorable environments using chemotaxis. Mechanisms of sensing attractants are well understood; however, molecular aspects of how bacteria sense repellents have not been established. Here, we identified malate as a repellent recognized by the MCP2201 chemoreceptor in a bacterium Comamonas testosteroni and showed that it binds to the same site as an attractant citrate. Binding determinants for a repellent and an attractant had only minor differences, and a single amino acid substitution in the binding site inverted the response to malate from a repellent to an attractant. We found that malate and citrate affect the oligomerization state of the ligand-binding domain in opposing way. We also observed opposing effects of repellent and attractant binding on the orientation of an alpha helix connecting the sensory domain to the transmembrane helix. We propose a model to illustrate how positive and negative signals might be generated.

Bacterial chemoreceptor signaling complexes control kinase activity by stabilizing the catalytic domain of CheA.

Motile bacteria have a chemotaxis system that enables them to sense their environment and direct their swimming toward favorable conditions. Chemotaxis involves a signaling process in which ligand binding to the extracellular domain of the chemoreceptor alters the activity of the histidine kinase, CheA, bound ~300 Å away to the distal cytoplasmic tip of the receptor, to initiate a phosphorylation cascade that controls flagellar rotation. The cytoplasmic domain of the receptor is thought to propagate this signal via changes in dynamics and/or stability, but it is unclear how these changes modulate the kinase activity of CheA. To address this question, we have used hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to probe the structure and dynamics of CheA within functional signaling complexes of the Escherichia coli aspartate receptor cytoplasmic fragment, CheA, and CheW. Our results reveal that stabilization of the P4 catalytic domain of CheA correlates with kinase activation. Furthermore, differences in activation of the kinase that occur during sensory adaptation depend on receptor destabilization of the P3 dimerization domain of CheA. Finally, hydrogen exchange properties of the P1 domain that bears the phosphorylated histidine identify the dimer interface of P1/P1' in the CheA dimer and support an ordered sequential binding mechanism of catalysis, in which dimeric P1/P1' has productive interactions with P4 only upon nucleotide binding. Thus stabilization/destabilization of domains is a key element of the mechanism of modulating CheA kinase activity in chemotaxis, and may play a role in the control of other kinases.

A nonequilibrium allosteric model for receptor-kinase complexes: The role of energy dissipation in chemotaxis signaling.

The Escherichia coli chemotaxis signaling pathway has served as a model system for the adaptive sensing of environmental signals by large protein complexes. The chemoreceptors control the kinase activity of CheA in response to the extracellular ligand concentration and adapt across a wide concentration range by undergoing methylation and demethylation. Methylation shifts the kinase response curve by orders of magnitude in ligand concentration while incurring a much smaller change in the ligand binding curve. Here, we show that the disproportionate shift in binding and kinase response is inconsistent with equilibrium allosteric models. To resolve this inconsistency, we present a nonequilibrium allosteric model that explicitly includes the dissipative reaction cycles driven by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis. The model successfully explains all existing joint measurements of ligand binding, receptor conformation, and kinase activity for both aspartate and serine receptors. Our results suggest that the receptor complex acts as an enzyme: Receptor methylation modulates the ON-state kinetics of the kinase (e.g., phosphorylation rate), while ligand binding controls the equilibrium balance between kinase ON/OFF states. Furthermore, sufficient energy dissipation is responsible for maintaining and enhancing the sensitivity range and amplitude of the kinase response. We demonstrate that the nonequilibrium allosteric model is broadly applicable to other sensor-kinase systems by successfully fitting previously unexplained data from the DosP bacterial oxygen-sensing system. Overall, this work provides a nonequilibrium physics perspective on cooperative sensing by large protein complexes and opens up research directions for understanding their microscopic mechanisms through simultaneous measurements and modeling of ligand binding and downstream responses.

Chemoreceptors in Sinorhizobium meliloti require minimal pentapeptide tethers to provide adaptational assistance.

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by posttranslational modifications of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). In Escherichia coli, the adaptation proteins CheR and CheB tether to a conserved C-terminal receptor pentapeptide. Here,we investigated the function of the pentapeptide motif (N/D)WE(E/N)F in Sinorhizobium meliloti chemotaxis. Isothermal titration calorimetry revealed stronger affinity of the pentapeptides to CheR and activated CheB relative to unmodified CheB. Strains with mutations of the conserved tryptophan in one or all four MCP pentapeptides resulted in a significant decrease or loss of chemotaxis to glycine betaine, lysine, and acetate, chemoattractants sensed by pentapeptide-bearing McpX and pentapeptide-lacking McpU and McpV, respectively. Importantly, we discovered that the pentapeptide mediates chemotaxis when fused to the C-terminus of pentapeptide-lacking chemoreceptors via a flexible linker. We propose that adaptational assistance and a threshold number of available sites enable the efficient docking of adaptation proteins to the chemosensory array. Altogether, these results demonstrate that S. meliloti effectively utilizes a pentapeptide-dependent adaptation system with a minimal number of tethering units to assist pentapeptide-lacking chemoreceptors and hypothesize that the higher abundance of CheR and CheB in S. meliloti compared to E. coli allows for ample recruitment of adaptation proteins to the chemosensory array.

The dual role of a novel Sinorhizobium meliloti chemotaxis protein CheT in signal termination and adaptation.

Sinorhizobium meliloti senses nutrients and compounds exuded from alfalfa host roots and coordinates an excitation, termination, and adaptation pathway during chemotaxis. We investigated the role of the novel S. meliloti chemotaxis protein CheT. While CheT and the Escherichia coli phosphatase CheZ share little sequence homology, CheT is predicted to possess an α-helix with a DXXXQ phosphatase motif. Phosphorylation assays demonstrated that CheT dephosphorylates the phosphate-sink response regulator, CheY1~P by enhancing its decay two-fold but does not affect the motor response regulator CheY2~P. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) experiments revealed that CheT binds to a phosphomimic of CheY1~P with a KD of 2.9 µM, which is 25-fold stronger than its binding to CheY1. Dissimilar chemotaxis phenotypes of the ΔcheT mutant and cheT DXXXQ phosphatase mutants led to the hypothesis that CheT exerts additional function(s). A screen for potential binding partners of CheT revealed that it forms a complex with the methyltransferase CheR. ITC experiments confirmed CheT/CheR binding with a KD of 19 µM, and a SEC-MALS analysis determined a 1:1 and 2:1 CheT/CheR complex formation. Although they did not affect each other's enzymatic activity, CheT binding to CheY1~P and CheR may serve as a link between signal termination and sensory adaptation.

Differential CheR Affinity for Chemoreceptor C-Terminal Pentapeptides Modulates Chemotactic Responses.

Many chemoreceptors contain a C-terminal pentapeptide at the end of a linker. In Escherichia coli, this pentapeptide forms a high-affinity binding site for CheR and phosphorylated CheB, and its removal interferes with chemoreceptor adaptation. Analysis of chemoreceptors revealed significant variation in their pentapeptide sequences, and bacteria often possess multiple chemoreceptors with differing pentapeptides. To assess whether this sequence variation alters CheR affinity and chemotaxis, we used Pectobacterium atrosepticum SCRI1043 as a model. SCRI1043 has 36 chemoreceptors, with 19 of them containing a C-terminal pentapeptide. We show that the affinity of CheR for the different pentapeptides varies up to 11-fold (KD 90 nM to 1 µM). Pentapeptides with the highest and lowest affinities differ only in a single amino acid. Deletion of the cheR gene abolishes chemotaxis. The replacement of the pentapeptide in the PacC chemoreceptor with those of the highest and lowest affinities significantly reduced chemotaxis to its cognate chemoeffector, L-Asp. Altering the PacC pentapeptide also reduced chemotaxis to L-Ser, but not to nitrate, which are responses mediated by the nontethered PacB and PacN chemoreceptors, respectively. Changes in the pentapeptide sequence thus modulate the response of the cognate receptor and that of another chemoreceptor.

The switching mechanism of the bacterial rotary motor combines tight regulation with inherent flexibility.

Regulatory switches are wide spread in many biological systems. Uniquely among them, the switch of the bacterial flagellar motor is not an on/off switch but rather controls the motor's direction of rotation in response to binding of the signaling protein CheY. Despite its extensive study, the molecular mechanism underlying this switch has remained largely unclear. Here, we resolved the functions of each of the three CheY-binding sites at the switch in E. coli, as well as their different dependencies on phosphorylation and acetylation of CheY. Based on this, we propose that CheY motor switching activity is potentiated upon binding to the first site. Binding of potentiated CheY to the second site produces unstable switching and at the same time enables CheY binding to the third site, an event that stabilizes the switched state. Thereby, this mechanism exemplifies a unique combination of tight motor regulation with inherent switching flexibility.

Signal binding at both modules of its dCache domain enables the McpA chemoreceptor of Bacillus velezensis to sense different ligands.

Bacteria have evolved multiple signal transduction systems that permit an adaptation to changing environmental conditions. Chemoreceptor-based signaling cascades are very abundant in bacteria and are among the most complex signaling systems. Currently, our knowledge on the molecular features that determine signal recognition at chemoreceptors is limited. Chemoreceptor McpA of Bacillus velezensis SQR9 has been shown to mediate chemotaxis to a broad range of different ligands. Here we show that its ligand binding domain binds directly 13 chemoattractants. We provide support that organic acids and amino acids bind to the membrane-distal and membrane-proximal module of the dCache domain, respectively, whereas binding of sugars/sugar alcohols occurred at both modules. Structural biology studies combined with site-directed mutagenesis experiments have permitted to identify 10 amino acid residues that play key roles in the recognition of multiple ligands. Residues in membrane-distal and membrane-proximal regions were central for sensing organic acids and amimo acids, respectively, whereas all residues participated in sugars/sugar alcohol sensing. Most characterized chemoreceptors possess a narrow and well-defined ligand spectrum. We propose here a sensing mechanism involving both dCache modules that allows the integration of very diverse signals by a single chemoreceptor.

Structural signatures of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor signaling states revealed by cellular crosslinking.

The chemotaxis machinery of Escherichia coli has served as a model for exploring the molecular signaling mechanisms of transmembrane chemoreceptors known as methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). Yet, fundamental questions about signal transmission through MCP molecules remain unanswered. Our work with the E. coli serine chemoreceptor Tsr has developed in vivo reporters that distinguish kinase-OFF and kinase-ON structures in the cytoplasmic methylation helix (MH) cap, which receives stimulus signals from an adjoining, membrane-proximal histidine kinase, adenylyl cyclases, MCPs, and phosphatases (HAMP) domain. The cytoplasmic helices of the Tsr homodimer interact mainly through packing interactions of hydrophobic residues at a and d heptad positions. We investigated the in vivo crosslinking properties of Tsr molecules bearing cysteine replacements at functionally tolerant g heptad positions in the N-terminal and C-terminal cap helices. Upon treatment of cells with bismaleimidoethane (BMOE), a bifunctional thiol-reagent, Tsr-G273C/Q504C readily formed a doubly crosslinked product in the presence of serine but not in its absence. Moreover, a serine stimulus combined with BMOE treatment during in vivo Förster resonance energy transfer-based kinase assays locked Tsr-G273C/Q504C in kinase-OFF output. An OFF-shifting lesion in MH1 (D269P) promoted the formation of the doubly crosslinked species in the absence of serine, whereas an ON-shifting lesion (G268P) suppressed the formation of the doubly crosslinked species. Tsr-G273C/Q504C also showed output-dependent crosslinking patterns in combination with ON-shifting and OFF-shifting adaptational modifications. Our results are consistent with a helix breathing-axial rotation-bundle repacking signaling mechanism and imply that in vivo crosslinking tools could serve to probe helix-packing transitions and their output consequences in other regions of the receptor molecule.

Helicobacter pylori cheV1 mutants recover semisolid agar migration due to loss of a previously uncharacterized Type IV filament membrane alignment complex homolog.

The bacterial chemotaxis system is a well-understood signaling pathway that promotes bacterial success. Chemotaxis systems comprise chemoreceptors and the CheA kinase, linked by CheW or CheV scaffold proteins. Scaffold proteins provide connections between chemoreceptors and CheA and also between chemoreceptors to create macromolecular arrays. Chemotaxis is required for host colonization by many microbes, including the stomach pathogen Helicobacter pylori. This bacterium builds chemoreceptor-CheA contacts with two distinct scaffold proteins, CheW and CheV1. H. pylori cheW or cheV1 deletion mutants both lose chemoreceptor array formation, but show differing semisolid agar chemotaxis assay behaviors: ∆cheW mutants exhibit total migration failure, whereas ∆cheV1::cat mutants display a 50% reduction. On investigating these varied responses, we found that both mutants initially struggle with migration. However, over time, ∆cheV1::cat mutants develop a stable, enhanced migration capability, termed "migration-able" (Mig+). Whole-genome sequencing analysis of four distinct ∆cheV1::cat Mig+ strains identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in hpg27_252 (hp0273) that were predicted to truncate the encoded protein. Computational analysis of the hpg27_252-encoded protein revealed it encoded a hypothetical protein that was a remote homolog of the PilO Type IV filament membrane alignment complex protein. Although H. pylori lacks Type IV filaments, our analysis showed it retains an operon of genes for homologs of PilO, PilN, and PilM. Deleting hpg27_252 in the ∆cheV1::cat or wild type strain resulted in enhanced migration in semisolid agar. Our study thus reveals that while cheV1 mutants initially have significant migration defects, they can recover the migration ability through genetic suppressors, highlighting a complex regulatory mechanism in bacterial migration. IMPORTANCE: Chemotactic motility, present in over half of bacteria, depends on chemotaxis signaling systems comprising receptors, kinases, and scaffold proteins. In Helicobacter pylori, a stomach pathogen, chemotaxis is crucial for colonization, with CheV1 and CheW as key scaffold proteins. While both scaffolds are essential for building chemoreceptor complexes, their roles vary in other assays. Our research reexamines cheV1 mutants' behavior in semisolid agar, a standard chemotaxis test. Initially, cheV1 mutants exhibited defects similar to those of cheW mutants, but they evolved genetic suppressors that enhanced migration. These suppressors involve mutations in a previously uncharacterized gene, unknown in motility behavior. Our findings highlight the significant chemotaxis defects in cheV1 mutants and identify new elements influencing bacterial motility.

Azospirillum brasilense AerC and Tlp4b Cytoplasmic Chemoreceptors Are Promiscuous and Interact with the Two Membrane-Bound Chemotaxis Signaling Clusters Mediating Chemotaxis Responses.

Chemotaxis in Bacteria and Archaea depends on the presence of hexagonal polar arrays composed of membrane-bound chemoreceptors that interact with rings of baseplate signaling proteins. In the alphaproteobacterium Azospirillum brasilense, chemotaxis is controlled by two chemotaxis signaling systems (Che1 and Che4) that mix at the baseplates of two spatially distinct membrane-bound chemoreceptor arrays. The subcellular localization and organization of transmembrane chemoreceptors in chemotaxis signaling clusters have been well characterized but those of soluble chemoreceptors remain relatively underexplored. By combining mutagenesis, microscopy, and biochemical assays, we show that the cytoplasmic chemoreceptors AerC and Tlp4b function in chemotaxis and localize to and interact with membrane-bound chemoreceptors and chemotaxis signaling proteins from both polar arrays, indicating that soluble chemoreceptors are promiscuous. The interactions of AerC and Tlp4b with polar chemotaxis signaling clusters are not equivalent and suggest distinct functions. Tlp4b, but not AerC, modulates the abundance of chemoreceptors within the signaling clusters through an unknown mechanism. The AerC chemoreceptor, but not Tlp4b, is able to traffic in and out of chemotaxis signaling clusters depending on its level of expression. We also identify a role of the chemoreceptor composition of chemotaxis signaling clusters in regulating their polar subcellular organization. The organization of chemotaxis signaling proteins as large membrane-bound arrays underlies chemotaxis sensitivity. Our findings suggest that the composition of chemoreceptors may fine-tune chemotaxis signaling not only through their chemosensory specificity but also through their role in the organization of polar chemotaxis signaling clusters. IMPORTANCE Cytoplasmic chemoreceptors represent about 14% of all chemoreceptors encoded in bacterial and archaeal genomes, but little is known about how they interact with and function in large polar assemblies of membrane-bound chemotaxis signaling clusters. Here, we show that two soluble chemoreceptors with a role in chemotaxis are promiscuous and interact with two distinct membrane-bound chemotaxis signaling clusters that control all chemotaxis responses in Azospirillum brasilense. We also found that any change in the chemoreceptor composition of chemotaxis signaling clusters alters their polar organization, suggesting a dynamic interplay between the sensory specificity of chemotaxis signaling clusters and their polar membrane organization.

Chemotaxis Coupling Protein CheW2 Is Not Required for the Chemotaxis but Contributes to the Full Pathogenicity of Borreliella burgdorferi.

The bacterial chemotaxis regulatory circuit mainly consists of coupling protein CheW, sensor histidine kinase CheA, and response regulator CheY. Most bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, have a single gene encoding each of these proteins. Interestingly, the Lyme disease pathogen, Borreliella burgdorferi, has multiple chemotaxis proteins, e.g., two CheA, three CheW, and three CheY proteins. The genes encoding these proteins mainly reside in two operons: cheW2-cheA1-cheB2-cheY2 (A-I) and cheA2-cheW3-cheX-cheY3 (A-II). Previous studies demonstrate that all the genes in A-II are essential for the chemotaxis of B. burgdorferi; however, the role of those genes in A-I remains unknown. This study aimed to fill this gap using the CheW2 gene, the first gene in A-I, as a surrogate. We first mapped the transcription start site of A-I upstream of cheW2 and identified a σ70-like promoter (PW2) and two binding sites (BS1 and BS2) of BosR, an unorthodox Fur/Per homolog. We then demonstrated that BosR binds to PW2 via BS1 and BS2 and that deletion of bosR significantly represses the expression of cheW2 and other genes in A-I, implying that BosR is a positive regulator of A-I. Deletion of cheW2 has no impact on the chemotaxis of B. burgdorferi in vitro but abrogates its ability to evade host adaptive immunity, because the mutant can establish systemic infection only in SCID mice and not in immunocompetent BALB/c mice. This report substantiates the previous proposition that A-I is not implicated in chemotaxis; rather, it may function as a signaling transduction pathway to regulate B. burgdorferi virulence gene expression.

The structural analysis of the periplasmic domain of Sinorhizobium meliloti chemoreceptor McpZ reveals a novel fold and suggests a complex mechanism of transmembrane signaling.

Chemotaxis is a fundamental process whereby bacteria seek out nutrient sources and avoid harmful chemicals. For the symbiotic soil bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti, the chemotaxis system also plays an essential role in the interaction with its legume host. The chemotactic signaling cascade is initiated through interactions of an attractant or repellent compound with chemoreceptors or methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). S. meliloti possesses eight chemoreceptors to mediate chemotaxis. Six of these receptors are transmembrane proteins with periplasmic ligand-binding domains (LBDs). The specific functions of McpW and McpZ are still unknown. Here, we report the crystal structure of the periplasmic domain of McpZ (McpZPD) at 2.7 Å resolution. McpZPD assumes a novel fold consisting of three concatenated four-helix bundle modules. Through phylogenetic analyses, we discovered that this helical tri-modular domain fold arose within the Rhizobiaceae family and is still evolving rapidly. The structure, offering a rare view of a ligand-free dimeric MCP-LBD, reveals a novel dimerization interface. Molecular dynamics calculations suggest ligand binding will induce conformational changes that result in large horizontal helix movements within the membrane-proximal domains of the McpZPD dimer that are accompanied by a 5 Å vertical shift of the terminal helix toward the inner cell membrane. These results suggest a mechanism of transmembrane signaling for this family of MCPs that entails both piston-type and scissoring movements. The predicted movements terminate in a conformation that closely mirrors those observed in related ligand-bound MCP-LBDs.

Analysis of CheW-like domains provides insights into organization of prokaryotic chemotaxis systems.

The ability to control locomotion in a dynamic environment provides a competitive advantage for microorganisms, thus driving the evolution of sophisticated regulatory systems. In total, 19 known categories of chemotaxis systems control motility mediated by flagella or Type IV pili, plus other cellular functions. A key feature that distinguishes chemotaxis systems from generic two-component regulatory systems is separation of receptor and kinase functions into distinct proteins, linked by CheW scaffold proteins. This arrangement allows for formation of varied arrays with remarkable signaling properties. We recently analyzed sequences of CheW-like domains found in CheA kinases and CheW and CheV scaffold proteins. In total, 16 Architectures of CheA, CheW, and CheV proteins contain ~94% of all CheW-like domains and form six Classes with likely functional specializations. We surveyed chemotaxis system categories and proteins containing CheW-like domains in ~1900 prokaryotic species, the most comprehensive analysis to date, revealing new insights. Co-occurrence analyses suggested that many chemotaxis systems occur in non-random combinations within species, implying synergy or antagonism. Furthermore, many Architectures of proteins containing CheW-like domains occurred predominantly with specific categories of chemotaxis systems, suggesting specialized functional interactions. We propose Class 1 (~80%) and Class 6 (~20%) CheW proteins exhibit preferences for distinct chemoreceptor structures. Furthermore, rare (~1%) Class 2 CheW proteins frequently co-occurred with methyl-accepting coiled coil proteins, which contain both receptor and kinase functions and so do not require connection via a CheW scaffold but may benefit from arrays. Last, rare multidomain CheW proteins may interact with different receptors than single-domain CheW proteins.

Timescale separation in the coordinated switching of bacterial flagellar motors.

The output of the bacterial chemotaxis signaling pathway, the level of the intracellular regulator CheY-P, modulates the rotation direction of the flagellar motor, thereby regulating bacterial run-and-tumble behavior. The multiple flagellar motors on anE. colicell are controlled by a common cytoplasmic pool of CheY-P. Fluctuation of the CheY-P level was thought to be able to coordinate the switching of multiple motors. Here, we measured the correlation of rotation directions between two motors on a cell, finding that it surprisingly exhibits two well separated timescales. We found that the slow timescale (∼6 s) can be explained by the slow fluctuation of the CheY-P level due to stochastic activity of the chemotactic adaptation enzymes, whereas the fast timescale (∼0.3 s) can be explained by the random pulse-like fluctuation of the CheY-P level, due probably to the activity of the chemoreceptor clusters. We extracted information on the properties of the fast CheY-P pulses based on the correlation measurements. The two well-separated timescales in the fluctuation of CheY-P level help to coordinate multiple motors on a cell and to enhance bacterial chemotactic performance.

Motile ghosts of the halophilic archaeon, Haloferax volcanii.

Archaea swim using the archaellum (archaeal flagellum), a reversible rotary motor consisting of a torque-generating motor and a helical filament, which acts as a propeller. Unlike the bacterial flagellar motor (BFM), ATP (adenosine-5'-triphosphate) hydrolysis probably drives both motor rotation and filamentous assembly in the archaellum. However, direct evidence is still lacking due to the lack of a versatile model system. Here, we present a membrane-permeabilized ghost system that enables the manipulation of intracellular contents, analogous to the triton model in eukaryotic flagella and gliding Mycoplasma We observed high nucleotide selectivity for ATP driving motor rotation, negative cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis, and the energetic requirement for at least 12 ATP molecules to be hydrolyzed per revolution of the motor. The response regulator CheY increased motor switching from counterclockwise (CCW) to clockwise (CW) rotation. Finally, we constructed the torque-speed curve at various [ATP]s and discuss rotary models in which the archaellum has characteristics of both the BFM and F1-ATPase. Because archaea share similar cell division and chemotaxis machinery with other domains of life, our ghost model will be an important tool for the exploration of the universality, diversity, and evolution of biomolecular machinery.

Biphasic chemotaxis of Escherichia coli to the microbiota metabolite indole.

Bacterial chemotaxis to prominent microbiota metabolites such as indole is important in the formation of microbial communities in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. However, the basis of chemotaxis to indole is poorly understood. Here, we exposed Escherichia coli to a range of indole concentrations and measured the dynamic responses of individual flagellar motors to determine the chemotaxis response. Below 1 mM indole, a repellent-only response was observed. At 1 mM indole and higher, a time-dependent inversion from a repellent to an attractant response was observed. The repellent and attractant responses were mediated by the Tsr and Tar chemoreceptors, respectively. Also, the flagellar motor itself mediated a repellent response independent of the receptors. Chemotaxis assays revealed that receptor-mediated adaptation to indole caused a bipartite response-wild-type cells were attracted to regions of high indole concentration if they had previously adapted to indole but were otherwise repelled. We propose that indole spatially segregates cells based on their state of adaptation to repel invaders while recruiting beneficial resident bacteria to growing microbial communities within the GI tract.

Suppression of cell-cell variation by cooperative interaction of phosphatase and response regulator.

In bacterial chemotaxis, the output of chemosensing, the concentration of the response regulator CheY-P that was constantly adjusted by the opposing action of the kinase CheA and the phosphatase CheZ, serves as the input of the ultrasensitive flagellar motor that drives bacterial motility. The steady-state kinase activity exhibits large cell-to-cell variation that may result in similar variation in CheY-P concentration. Here, we found that the in vivo phosphatase activity is highly cooperative with respect to CheY-P concentration, and this suppresses the cell-to-cell variation of CheY-P concentration so that it falls within the operational range of the flagellar motor. Therefore, the cooperativity of the CheZ and CheY-P interaction we identified here provided a mechanism of robust coupling between the output of chemosensing and the input of the flagellar motor. Suppression of cell heterogeneity by cooperativity of protein-protein interaction is likely a common feature in many biological signaling systems.

Methylation-Independent Chemotaxis Systems Are the Norm for Gastric-Colonizing Helicobacter Species.

Many bacteria and archaea rely on chemotaxis signal transduction systems for optimal fitness. These complex, multiprotein signaling systems have core components found in all chemotactic microbes, as well as variable proteins found in only some species. We do not yet understand why these variations exist or whether there are specific niches that favor particular chemotaxis signaling organization. One variation is in the presence/absence of the chemotaxis methylation adaptation enzymes CheB and CheR. Genes for CheB and CheR are missing in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori but present in related Helicobacter that colonize the liver or intestine. In this work, we asked whether there was a general pattern of CheB/CheR across multiple Helicobacter species. Helicobacter spp. all possess chemotactic behavior, based on the presence of genes for core signaling proteins CheA, CheW, and chemoreceptors. Genes for the CheB and CheR proteins, in contrast, were variably present. Niche mapping supported the idea that these genes were present in enterohepatic Helicobacter species and absent in gastric ones. We then analyzed whether there were differences between gastric and enterohepatic species in the CheB/CheR chemoreceptor target methylation sites. Indeed, these sites were less conserved in gastric species that lack CheB/CheR. Lastly, we determined that cheB and cheR could serve as markers to indicate whether an unknown Helicobacter species was of enterohepatic or gastric origin. Overall, these findings suggest the interesting idea that methylation-based adaptation is not required in specific environments, particularly the stomach. IMPORTANCE Chemotaxis signal transduction systems are common in the archaeal and bacterial world, but not all systems contain the same components. The rationale for this system variation remains unknown. In this report, comparative genomics analysis showed that the presence/absence of CheR and CheB is one main variation within the Helicobacter genus, and it is strongly associated with the niche of Helicobacter species: gastric Helicobacter species, which infect animal stomachs, have lost their CheB and CheR, while enterohepatic Helicobacter species, which infect the liver and intestine, retain them. This study not only provides an example that a chemotaxis system variant is associated with particular niches but also proposes that CheB and CheR are new markers distinguishing gastric from enterohepatic Helicobacter species.