ChaMP-CMD: A Phenotype-Blinded, Randomized Controlled, Cross-Over Trial.

BACKGROUND: Angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries is a common condition for which no effective treatment has been established. We hypothesized that the measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR) allows identification of patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries who would benefit from anti-ischemic therapy. METHODS: Patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries underwent blinded invasive CFR measurement and were randomly assigned to receive 4 weeks of amlodipine or ranolazine. After a 1-week washout, they crossed over to the other drug for 4 weeks; final assessment was after the cessation of study medication for another 4 weeks. The primary outcome was change in treadmill exercise time, and the secondary outcome was change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score in response to anti-ischemic therapy. Analysis was on a per protocol basis according to the following classification: coronary microvascular disease (CMD group) if CFR<2.5 and reference group if CFR≥2.5. The study protocol was registered before the first patient was enrolled (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN94728379). RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients (61±8 years of age; 62% women) underwent random assignment (57 CMD group and 30 reference group). Baseline exercise time and Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary scores were similar between groups. The CMD group had a greater increment (delta) in exercise time than the reference group in response to both amlodipine (difference in delta, 82 s [95% CI, 37-126 s]; P<0.001) and ranolazine (difference in delta, 68 s [95% CI, 21-115 s]; P=0.005). The CMD group reported a greater increment (delta) in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score than the reference group in response to ranolazine (difference in delta, 7 points [95% CI, 0-15]; P=0.048), but not to amlodipine (difference in delta, 2 points [95% CI, -5 to 8]; P=0.549). CONCLUSIONS: Among phenotypically similar patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries, only those with an impaired CFR derive benefit from anti-ischemic therapy. These findings support measurement of CFR to diagnose and guide management of this otherwise heterogeneous patient group.

Pharmacologic modulation of intracellular Na+ concentration with ranolazine impacts inflammatory response in humans and mice.

Changes in Ca2+ influx during proinflammatory stimulation modulates cellular responses, including the subsequent activation of inflammation. Whereas the involvement of Ca2+ has been widely acknowledged, little is known about the role of Na+. Ranolazine, a piperazine derivative and established antianginal drug, is known to reduce intracellular Na+ as well as Ca2+ levels. In stable coronary artery disease patients (n = 51) we observed reduced levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP) 3 mo after the start of ranolazine treatment (n = 25) as compared to the control group. Furthermore, we found that in 3,808 acute coronary syndrome patients of the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial, individuals treated with ranolazine (1,934 patients) showed reduced CRP values compared to placebo-treated patients. The antiinflammatory effects of sodium modulation were further confirmed in an atherosclerotic mouse model. LDL-/- mice on a high-fat diet were treated with ranolazine, resulting in a reduced atherosclerotic plaque burden, increased plaque stability, and reduced activation of the immune system. Pharmacological Na+ inhibition by ranolazine led to reduced express of adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines and reduced adhesion of leukocytes to activated endothelium both in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate that functional Na+ shuttling is required for a full cellular response to inflammation and that inhibition of Na+ influx results in an attenuated inflammatory reaction. In conclusion, we demonstrate that inhibition of Na+-Ca2+ exchange during inflammation reduces the inflammatory response in human endothelial cells in vitro, in a mouse atherosclerotic disease model, and in human patients.

Ranolazine: a potential anti-metastatic drug targeting voltage-gated sodium channels.

BACKGROUND: Multi-faceted evidence from a range of cancers suggests strongly that de novo expression of voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) plays a significant role in driving cancer cell invasiveness. Under hypoxic conditions, common to growing tumours, VGSCs develop a persistent current (INaP) which can be blocked selectively by ranolazine. METHODS: Several different carcinomas were examined. We used data from a range of experimental approaches relating to cellular invasiveness and metastasis. These were supplemented by survival data mined from cancer patients. RESULTS: In vitro, ranolazine inhibited invasiveness of cancer cells especially under hypoxia. In vivo, ranolazine suppressed the metastatic abilities of breast and prostate cancers and melanoma. These data were supported by a major retrospective epidemiological study on breast, colon and prostate cancer patients. This showed that risk of dying from cancer was reduced by ca.60% among those taking ranolazine, even if this started 4 years after the diagnosis. Ranolazine was also shown to reduce the adverse effects of chemotherapy on heart and brain. Furthermore, its anti-cancer effectiveness could be boosted by co-administration with other drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Ranolazine, alone or in combination with appropriate therapies, could be reformulated as a safe anti-metastatic drug offering many potential advantages over current systemic treatment modalities.

Association between Ranolazine, Ischemic Preconditioning, and Cardioprotection in Patients Undergoing Scheduled Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background and Objectives: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has demonstrated efficacy in protecting against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury when applied before percutaneous coronary revascularization. Ranolazine, an anti-ischemic drug, has been utilized to minimize ischemic events in chronic angina patients. However, there is a lack of trials exploring the combined effects of ranolazine pretreatment and RIPC in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Materials and Methods: The present study is a prospective study which enrolled 150 patients scheduled for nonemergent percutaneous coronary revascularization. Three groups were formed: a control group undergoing only PCIs, an RIPC group with RIPC applied to either upper limb before the PCI (preconditioning group), and a group with RIPC before the PCI along with prior ranolazine treatment for stable angina (ranolazine group). Statistical analyses, including ANOVAs and Kruskal-Wallis tests, were conducted, with the Bonferroni correction for type I errors. A repeated-measures ANOVA assessed the changes in serum enzyme levels (SGOT, LDH, CRP, CPK, CK-MB, troponin I) over the follow-up. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The ranolazine group showed (A) significantly lower troponin I level increases compared to the control group for up to 24 h, (B) significantly lower CPK levels after 4, 10, and 24 h compared to the preconditioning group (p = 0.020, p = 0.020, and p = 0.019, respectively) and significantly lower CPK levels compared to the control group after 10 h (p = 0.050), and (C) significantly lower CK-MB levels after 10 h compared to the control group (p = 0.050). Conclusions: This study suggests that combining RIPC before scheduled coronary procedures with ranolazine pretreatment may be linked to reduced ischemia induction, as evidenced by lower myocardial enzyme levels.

Open-label pilot study of ranolazine for cramps in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Neuronal hyperexcitability (manifested by cramps) plays a pathological role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and drugs affecting it may help symptomatic management and slow disease progression. We aimed to determine safety and tolerability of two doses of ranolazine in patients with ALS and evaluate for preliminary evidence of drug-target engagement by assessing muscle cramp characteristics. METHODS: We performed an open-label dose-ascending study of ranolazine in 14 individuals with ALS in two sequential cohorts: 500 mg (cohort 1) and 1000 mg (cohort 2) orally twice daily. Each had a 2-week run-in period, 4-week drug administration, and 6-week safety follow-up. Primary outcome was safety and tolerability. Exploratory measures included cramp frequency and severity, fasciculation frequency, cramp potential duration, ALS Functional Rating Scale---Revised score, and forced vital capacity. RESULTS: Six and eight participants were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. There were no serious adverse events. Two subjects in cohort 2 discontinued the drug due to constipation. The most frequent drug-related adverse event was gastrointestinal (40%). Cramp frequency decreased by 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39%-70.8%) and severity decreased by 46.3% (95% CI, 29.5-63.3%), which appeared to be dose-dependent, with decreased awakening due to cramps. Other outcomes showed no change. DISCUSSION: Ranolazine was well tolerated in ALS up to 2000 mg/day, with gastrointestinal side effects being the most frequent. Ranolazine reduced cramp frequency and severity, supporting its investigation for muscle cramps in a future placebo-controlled trial.

The anti-anginal ranolazine does not confer beneficial actions against hepatic steatosis in male mice subjected to high-fat diet and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by the accumulation of excess fat in the liver in the absence of alcohol and increases one's risk for both diabetes and cardiovascular disease (e.g., angina). We have shown that the second-line anti-anginal therapy, ranolazine, mitigates obesity-induced NAFLD, and our aim was to determine whether these actions of ranolazine also extend to NAFLD associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Eight-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were fed either a low-fat diet or a high-fat diet for 15 weeks, with a single dose of streptozotocin (STZ; 75 mg/kg) administered in the high-fat diet-fed mice at 4 weeks to induce experimental T2D. Mice were treated with either vehicle control or ranolazine during the final 7 weeks (50 mg/kg once daily). We assessed glycemia via monitoring glucose tolerance, insulin tolerance, and pyruvate tolerance, whereas hepatic steatosis was assessed via quantifying triacylglycerol content. We observed that ranolazine did not improve glycemia in mice with experimental T2D, while also having no impact on hepatic triacylglycerol content. Therefore, the salutary actions of ranolazine against NAFLD may be limited to obese individuals but not those who are obese with T2D.

Ranolazine Attenuates Brain Inflammation in a Rat Model of Type 2 Diabetes.

Recent studies suggest a pathogenetic association between metabolic disturbances, including type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and cognitive decline and indicate that T2DM may represent a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). There are a number of experimental studies presenting evidence that ranolazine, an antianginal drug, acts as a neuroprotective drug. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of ranolazine on hippocampal neurodegeneration and astrocytes activation in a T2DM rat model. Diabetes was induced by a high fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ) injection. Animals were divided into the following groups: HFD/STZ + Ranolazine, HFD/STZ + Metformin, HFD/STZ + Vehicle, NCD + Vehicle, NCD + Ranolazine and NCD + Metformin. The presence of neurodegeneration was evaluated in the hippocampal cornus ammonis 1 (CA1) region by cresyl violet staining histological methods, while astrocyte activation was assessed by western blot analysis. Staining with cresyl violet highlighted a decrease in neuronal density and cell volume in the hippocampal CA1 area in diabetic HFD/STZ + Vehicle rats, while ranolazine and metformin both improved T2DM-induced neuronal loss and neuronal damage. Moreover, there was an increased expression of GFAP in the HFD/STZ + Vehicle group compared to the treated diabetic groups. In conclusion, in the present study, we obtained additional evidence supporting the potential use of ranolazine to counteract T2DM-associated cognitive decline.

Ranolazine Interacts Antagonistically with Some Classical Antiepileptic Drugs-An Isobolographic Analysis.

Ranolazine, an antianginal and antiarrhythmic drug blocking slow inactivating persistent sodium currents, is described as a compound with anticonvulsant potential. Since arrhythmia often accompanies seizures, patients suffering from epilepsy are frequently co-treated with antiepileptic and antiarrhythmic drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ranolazine on maximal-electroshock (MES)-induced seizures in mice as well as interactions between ranolazine and classical antiepileptic drugs in this model of epilepsy. Types of pharmacodynamic interactions were established by isobolographic analysis of obtained data. The main findings of the study were that ranolazine behaves like an antiseizure drug in the MES test. Moreover, ranolazine interacted antagonistically with carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital in the proportions of 1:3 and 1:1. These interactions occurred pharmacodynamic, since ranolazine did not change the brain levels of antiepileptic drugs measured in the fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Ranolazine and its combinations with carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital did not impair motor coordination evaluated in the chimney test. Unfortunately, an attempt to conduct a passive avoidance task (evaluating long-term memory) resulted in ranolazine-induced delayed lethality. In conclusion, ranolazine exhibits clear-cut anticonvulsant properties in the MES test but interacts antagonistically with some antiepileptic drugs. The obtained results need confirmation in clinical studies. The mechanisms of ranolazine-induced toxicity require specific explanation.

[Impact of late sodium current inhibition on cardiac electrophysiology parameters and ventricular arrhythmias in isolated Langendorff perfused rabbit hearts with short QT interval].

Objective: To determine the electrophysiological effects and related mechanisms of late sodium current inhibitors on hearts with short QT intervals. Methods: The electrophysiological study was performed on isolated Langendorff perfused rabbit hearts. A total of 80 New Zealand White rabbits were used and 34 hearts without drug treatment were defined as control group A, these hearts were then treated with IKATP opener pinacidil, defined as pinacidil group A. Then, 27 hearts from pinacidil group A were selected to receive combined perfusion with sodium channel inhibitors or quinidine, a traditional drug used to treat short QT syndrome, including ranolazine combined group (n=9), mexiletine combined group (n=9), and quinidine combined group (n=9). Nineteen out of the remaining 46 New Zealand rabbits were selected as control group B (no drug treatments, n=19), and then treated with pinacidil, defined as pinacidil group B (n=19). The remaining 27 rabbits were treated with sodium inhibitors or quinidine alone, including ranolazine alone group (n=9), mexiletine alone group (n=9), and quinidine alone group (n=9). Electrocardiogram (ECG) physiological parameters of control group A and pinacidil group A were collected. In control group B and pinacidil group B, programmed electrical stimulation was used to induce ventricular arrhythmias and ECG was collected. ECG physiological parameters and ventricular arrhythmia status of various groups were analyzed. The concentrations of pinacidil, ranolazine, mexiletine and quinidine used in this study were 30, 10, 30 and 1 µmol/L, respectively. Results: Compared with control group A, the QT interval, 90% of the repolarization in epicardial and endocardial monophasic action potential duration (MAPD90-Epi, MAPD90-Endo) was shortened, the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) was increased, and the effective refractor period (ERP) and post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR) were reduced in pinacidil group A (all P<0.05). Compared with the pinacidil group A, MAPD90-Epi, MAPD90-Endo, QT interval changes were reversed in quinidine combined group and mexiletine combined group (all P<0.05), but not in ranolazine combined group. All these three drugs reversed the pinacidil-induced increases of TDR and the decreases of ERP and PRR. The induced ventricular arrhythmia rate was 0 in control group B, and increased to 10/19 (χ2=13.6, P<0.05) in pinacidil group B during programmed electrical stimulation. Compared with the pinacidil group B, incidences of ventricular arrhythmia decreased to 11% (1/9), 11% (1/9) and 0 (0/9) (χ2=4.5, 4.5, 7.4, P<0.05) respectively in ranolazine group, mexiletine group and quinidine group. Conclusions: Inhibition of late sodium current does not increase but even decreases the risk of malignant arrhythmia in hearts with a shortened QT interval. The antiarrhythmic mechanism might be associated with the reversal of the increase of TDR and the decrease of refractoriness (including both ERP and PRR) of hearts with shortened QT interval.

Sodium channel blockers in the management of long QT syndrome types 3 and 2: A system review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: ß-Blockers are first-line therapy in patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS). However, ß-blockers had genotype dependent efficacy (LQT1>LQT2>LQT3). Sodium channel blockers have been recommended as add-on therapy for LQT3 patients. However, the pooled effect of sodium channel blockers in all LQTS patients remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a systematic electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Fixed effects model was used to assess the effect of sodium channel blockers on QTc, cardiac events (CEs), and the proportion of QTc ≥ 500 ms and QTc ≤ 460 ms in LQTS patients. RESULTS: Pooled analysis of 14 studies with 213 LQTS (9 LQT1 + 63 LQT2 + 135 LQT3 + 6 others) patients showed that sodium channel blockers significantly shortened QTc by nearly 50 ms (mean difference [MD], -49.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], -57.80 to -41.05, p < .001), reduced the incidence of CEs (risk ratio [RR], 0.23; 95% CI, 0.11-0.47; p < .001) and the proportion of QTc ≥ 500 ms (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.24-0.47; p < .001), and increased the proportion of QTc ≤ 460 ms (RR, 10.33; 95% CI, 4.62-23.09; p < .001). Sodium channel blockers significantly shortened QTc both in LQT3 and LQT2 patients, while the QTc shortening effect in LQT3 was superior to that in LQT2 (57.39 vs. 36.61 ms). Mexiletine, flecainide, and ranolazine all significantly shortened QTc, and the QTc shortening effect by mexiletine was the best (60.70 vs. 49.08 vs. 50.10 ms). CONCLUSIONS: Sodium channel blockers can be useful both in LQT3 and LQT2 patients. Mexiletine, flecainide and ranolazine significantly shortened QTc in LQTS patients, and the QTc shortening effect by mexiletine was the best.

Ranolazine Improves Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension: Results From a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: A major outcome determinant in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is right ventricular (RV) function. We studied the effect of ranolazine on RV function over 6 months using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with precapillary PH (groups I, III, and IV). METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled patients with PH and RV dysfunction (CMR imaging ejection fraction [EF] of <45%) in a longitudinal, randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled, multicenter study of ranolazine treatment. All enrolled patients were on stable PH-specific therapy. Enrolled patients were assessed using CMR imaging, New York Heart Association functional class, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, 6-minute walk test, and quality of life health outcomes at baseline and repeated at the end of treatment. The primary outcome was change in RVEF after 6 months of treatment. Analysis of covariance was used to analyze the longitudinal changes taking into account baseline values, age, and sex, based on per protocol population. Twenty-two patients were enrolled, and 9 patients completed follow-up CMR imaging after ranolazine treatment and 6 completed placebo treatment. There was significant increase in RVEF at end of treatment compared with baseline in the ranolazine group adjusted for baseline values, age, and sex. There were no statistically significant changes in secondary outcomes such as changes in New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute walk distance, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, or quality of life measures. Ranolazine treated patients experienced a higher number of adverse events, but only one was discontinued owing to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Ranolazine may improve RV function in patients with precapillary PH. Larger studies are needed to confirm the beneficial effects of ranolazine.

Through the heart and beyond: a review on ranolazine.

Ranolazine derives from piperazine and has been approved as a drug for the therapy of chronic stable angina. It acts by selectively inhibiting the late sodium inward current. Moreover, ranolazine has other metabolic features which makes it effective in other diseases as well as coronary artery ones. In this paper I make an updated review of all possible therapeutic roles of ranolazine: through cardiology and beyond.

Guidelines on clinical presentation and management of nondystrophic myotonias.

The nondystrophic myotonias are rare muscle hyperexcitability disorders caused by gain-of-function mutations in the SCN4A gene or loss-of-function mutations in the CLCN1 gene. Clinically, they are characterized by myotonia, defined as delayed muscle relaxation after voluntary contraction, which leads to symptoms of muscle stiffness, pain, fatigue, and weakness. Diagnosis is based on history and examination findings, the presence of electrical myotonia on electromyography, and genetic confirmation. In the absence of genetic confirmation, the diagnosis is supported by detailed electrophysiological testing, exclusion of other related disorders, and analysis of a variant of uncertain significance if present. Symptomatic treatment with a sodium channel blocker, such as mexiletine, is usually the first step in management, as well as educating patients about potential anesthetic complications.

Ranolazine for Symptomatic Management of Microvascular Angina.

BACKGROUND: Ranolazine is approved in the United States and Europe for chronic stable angina. Microvascular angina (MVA) is defined as angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease. STUDY QUESTION: Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of ranolazine at improving angina scores and quality of life in a Canadian cohort with severe refractory angina due to MVA. STUDY DESIGN: We administered questionnaires to 31 patients at baseline and after at least 6 weeks of ranolazine treatment. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Validated, clinically significant changes for each Seattle Angina Questionnaire domain and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form were obtained from the literature. Score changes between baseline and postranolazine use were analyzed using sign test. RESULTS: Patients were mostly female (27 of 31 patients) with a median age of 57 years. After initiation of ranolazine treatment, patients experienced improvements in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form scores (80.6%; P < 0.01) and in 3 of the 4 domains of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (physical limitation: 73.3%; P = 0.02; treatment satisfaction: 80.6%; P < 0.01; and disease perception: 77.4%; P < 0.01). Patients were less likely to have interactions with the health care system after ranolazine treatment as compared with before (35.5% vs. 93.5%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Ranolazine significantly improves symptom control and quality of life in patients with MVA and severe refractory angina and reduces their interaction with the health care system. Given the potentially debilitating effect of chronic angina in MVA, ranolazine may be an effective treatment option.

Protective effects of Ranolazine on testicular torsion and detorsion injury in rats.

Ranolazine is a drug used in refractory chronic stable angina. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the protective effect of ranolazine in a testis torsion model in light of objective biochemical and pathological data. A total of 24 pre-pubertal male Wistar albino rats were separated into three groups of 8 as the sham group, control group and ranolazine group. Testis torsion was applied for 3 hr to all the rats in Group Control and Group Ranolazine. In Group Control, 0.9% NaCl was applied 1 hr after the torsion. In Group Ranolazine, ranolazine 30 mg/kg was dissolved in a 0.9% NaCl solution and was administered intraperitoneally 1 hr after torsion. Histopathological evaluation was made using the Cosentino score. As a result of the objective biochemical and pathological criteria used in this study, this protective effect of ranolazine was observed in testis torsion. The results obtained in this study may suggest that ranolazine is a drug that could be applied after detorsion to patients diagnosed with torsion.

A case of vasospastic angina. Vasospasm physiopathology: a new therapeutic role for ranolazine?

We report the case of a 40-year-old man, transferred from another hospital to our ICU because of acute coronary syndrome. Coronarography did not show coronary stenosis. Twenty-four hours monitoring EKG allowed diagnosis of Prinzmetal angina and appropriate therapy was administered. Six months after discharge due recurrence of symptoms, ranolazine was added to therapy. After one year the patient is symptoms free.

Ranolazine prevents pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure by restoring aberrant Na+ and Ca2+ handling.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure are characterized by increased late sodium current and abnormal Ca2+ handling. Ranolazine, a selective inhibitor of the late sodium current, can reduce sodium accumulation and Ca 2+ overload. In this study, we investigated the effects of ranolazine on pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure in mice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Inhibition of late sodium current with the selective inhibitor ranolazine suppressed cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis and improved heart function assessed by echocardiography, hemodynamics, and histological analysis in mice exposed to chronic pressure overload induced by transverse aortic constriction (TAC). Ca2+ imaging of ventricular myocytes from TAC mice revealed both abnormal SR Ca 2+ release and increased SR Ca 2+ leak. Ranolazine restored aberrant SR Ca 2+ handling induced by pressure overload. Ranolazine also suppressed Na + overload induced in the failing heart, and restored Na + -induced Ca 2+ overload in an sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX)-dependent manner. Ranolazine suppressed the Ca 2+ -dependent calmodulin (CaM)/CaMKII/myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) and CaM/CaMKII/calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) hypertrophy signaling pathways triggered by pressure overload. Pressure overload also prolonged endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress leading to ER-initiated apoptosis, while inhibition of late sodium current or NCX relieved ER stress and ER-initiated cardiomyocyte apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that inhibition of late sodium current with ranolazine improves pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and systolic and diastolic function by restoring Na+ and Ca 2+ handling, inhibiting the downstream hypertrophic pathways and ER stress. Inhibition of late sodium current may provide a new treatment strategy for cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure.

Open-label trial of ranolazine for the treatment of paramyotonia congenita.

INTRODUCTION: Paramyotonia congenita (PMC) is a nondystrophic myotonic disorder that is believed to be caused by a defect in Nav 1.4 sodium channel inactivation. Ranolazine, which acts by enhancing slow inactivation of sodium channels, has been proposed as a therapeutic option, but in vivo studies are lacking. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, single-center trial of ranolazine to evaluate efficacy and tolerability in patients with PMC. Subjective symptoms of stiffness, weakness, and pain as well as clinical and electrical myotonia were evaluated. Baseline measures were compared with those after 4 weeks of treatment with ranolazine. RESULTS: Ranolazine was tolerated well without any serious adverse events. Both subjective symptoms and clinical myotonia were significantly improved. Duration of myotonia was reduced according to electromyography, but this change was not statistically significant in all tested muscles. DISCUSSION: Our findings support the use of ranolazine as a treatment for myotonia in PMC and suggest that a randomized, placebo-controlled trial is warranted. Muscle Nerve 59:240-243, 2019.

The Effect of Ranolazine on Glycemic Control: a Narrative Review to Define the Target Population.

Ranolazine is an anti-anginal medication that reduces the sodium-dependent calcium overload via the inhibition of the late sodium current. After its approval for the treatment of chronic angina in 2006 in the USA, ranolazine has been reported to have several pleiotropic effects on various cardiac conditions, such as atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, diastolic and microvascular dysfunction, and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Recently, several studies reported some promising results on the potential benefits of ranolazine on glycemic control. Though the mechanism of the antihyperglycemic effect is still unknown, ranolazine may exert the effect through ß cell preservation, inhibition of glucose secretion, and enhancement of insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. Given the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes, it will be useful if one medication can simultaneously improve chronic angina and diabetes. Therefore, ranolazine could be a favored choice among other anti-anginal agents for patients with comorbidity of chronic angina and diabetes mellitus. In this review, we summarize the available data from clinical studies and provide valuable insight into defining the target population for the antihyperglycemic effect of ranolazine.