Exploring the Proteomic Alterations from Untreated and Cryoablation and Irradiation Treated Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Using Liquid-Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCT) are benign tumors that show a locally aggressive nature and affect bones' architecture. Recently, cryoablation and irradiation treatments have shown promising results in GCT patients with faster recovery and less recurrence and metastasis. Therefore, it became a gold standard surgical treatment for patients. Hence, we have compared GCT-untreated, cryoablation, and irradiation-treated samples to identify protein alterations using high-frequency liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS). Our label-free quantification analysis revealed a total of 107 proteins (p < 0.01) with 26 up-regulated (< 2-folds to 5-fold), and 81 down-regulated (> 0.1 to 0.5 folds) proteins were identified from GCT-untreated and treated groups. Based on pathway analysis, most of the identified up-regulated proteins involved in critical metabolic functions associated with tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis. On the other hand, the down-regulated proteins involved in glycolysis, tumor microenvironment, and apoptosis. The observed higher expressions of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and TGF-beta in the GCT-untreated group associated with bones' osteolytic process. Interestingly, both the proteins showed reduced expressions after cryoablation treatment, and contrast expressions identified in the irradiation treated group. Therefore, these expressions were confirmed by immunoblot analysis. In addition to these, several glycolytic enzymes, immune markers, extracellular matrix (ECM), and heat shock proteins showed adverse expressions in the GCT-untreated group were identified with favorable regulations after treatment. Therefore, the identified expression profiles will provide a better picture of treatment efficacy and effect on the molecular environment of GCT.

Treatment and outcome of malignant giant cell tumor in the spine.

Malignant giant cell tumor (MGCT) in the spine is extremely rare and there is little published information regarding this subject in the literature. We attempted to correlate different treatment options and outcomes over time. A retrospective study of patients with spinal MGCT who were surgically treated in our center between 2006 and 2012 was performed. Overall, three surgical management strategies, including subtotal resection, piecemeal total resection, and total en bloc spondylectomy were applied. Postoperative radiotherapy was carried out in 4 cases. Clinical data and efficacy of surgical treatment strategy were analyzed via chart review. A total of 14 patients with spinal MGCT were included in the study. Three cases were diagnosed as primary MGCT (PMGCT), while the other 11 patients were secondary MGCT (SMGCT). The mean follow-up period was 41 (range 3-75) months. Recurrence was found in 7 patients after surgery in our center, while distant metastasis and death occurred in 4 and 6 cases, respectively. MGCT of bone is always a high-grade sarcoma with a poor prognosis and complete excision, while also preserving neural function, is recommended. In our study, patients who underwent total en bloc spondylectomy had significantly lower local recurrence rate for MGCT in the spine.

Therapeutic radiotherapy for giant cell tumor of the spine: a systemic review.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is a benign but locally aggressive tumor. Giant cell tumor of the spine (GCTS) accounts for 3-6 % of GCTB. Surgery remains the treatment of choice. For those not suitable for surgery, therapeutic radiotherapy (RT) is one classic modality. Although there are several articles on therapeutic RT for GCTS therapy, few systemic reviews have been performed on effects of therapeutic RT on GCTS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We searched EMBASE and Medline databases for papers reporting therapeutic radiotherapy for GCTS patients not suitable for surgical resection. The inclusion criteria and prognosis indicators have been defined prior to data extraction. Information of the included patients has been discreetly recorded. We analyzed the prognosis of therapeutic RT and multiple data concerning the GCTS patients. The indicators for prognosis were computed by SPSS software. The local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. p values ≤0.5 were considered statistically significant. RESULT: We included 13 studies comprising 42 patients who received therapeutic radiotherapy with doses ranging from 21 to 80 Gy. The results suggested a response rate of 100 %, OS of 97.6 %, 1-year local control rate (LC) of 85.4 %, 2-year LC rate of 80.2 %, and overall LC of 79 %. No patient reported malignant transformation albeit four had post-RT neurological complications. Four had distant metastasis of the tumor. Patients with previously repeated recurrence had worse prognosis after RT (p = 0.028). No association between dosage and prognosis was found. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic RT could provide a satisfactory prognosis for GCTS patients according to this study, and can be an alternative treatment modality for GCTS patients not suitable for surgery.

Microwave in situ inactivation in the treatment of bone giant cell tumor: a mid-term descriptive study.

AIM: To evaluate the mid-term clinical efficacy of microwave in situ inactivation combined with bone grafting or polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) filling in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive, and analytical study. A total of 30 GCTB patients received microwave in situ inactivation from January 2012 to January 2020, whose clinical recurrence rate was evaluated at the last follow-up after microwave in situ inactivation surgery. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) function score was used to evaluate the postoperative clinical panoramic results. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 21 to 110 months, with an average of 63.79 months. Distal femur (40%) and proximal tibia (28%) had a higher rate of GCTB incidence. Seventeen percent of tumor patients suffered from associated pathologic fracture. The rate of Campanacci classification stage III was 60%. The average MSTS score was evaluated as 27.53 points overall at the last follow-up. In terms of complications, three, two, two and one cases developed fat liquefaction, controllable tissue rejection reaction, incision infection and degenerative changes around lesion joint, respectively, without in situ recurrences and reoperation as well as distant lung metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The method of microwave in situ inactivation combined with bone grafting or PMMA filling is prudently recommended as one of the options for the limb salvage treatment of giant cell tumor of long and periarticular bone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV: case series.

Secondary Malignancy in Giant Cell Tumor: A Single-Center Study.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) undergoes a sarcomatous transformation. Secondary malignancy in giant cell tumor (MGCT) is associated with radiotherapy and has a dismal prognosis. We reviewed medical records to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of MGCT patients. The enrollment criterion was high-grade spindle-cell sarcoma, which developed at the site of prior GCTB treatment. Twelve patients were analyzed: six females and six males. The median age was 42.5 years. Benign recurrence occurred in five GCTB patients not treated with radiotherapy. No pulmonary implants were observed. The median latency to the malignant transformation was 63 months. Nine patients were AJCC stage IIB, and three were stage IVA. The median follow-up period after malignant transformation was 62.5 months. Five patients developed local recurrence, and six had distant metastasis. Five-year overall recurrence and metastasis-free survival rates were 61.9%, 66.7%, and 58.3%, respectively. Initial metastasis was a predictive factor for overall survival. Benign local recurrence of GCTB was also a negative factor for metastasis-free survival of MGCT patients. Differences in overall survival according to benign recurrence also showed a tendency toward significance. In our series, secondary MGCT did not occur after radiotherapy. The prognosis was better than previous findings. Benign recurrence of GCTB could reflect the prognosis of MGCT.

Giant cell tumor of the cervical spine treated by carbon ion radiotherapy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the bone is a benign-malignant intermediate tumor with locally destructive growth and a relatively high local recurrence rate. Neurological symptoms may develop in patients with GCT of the spine, and surgical treatment is prioritized in cases where resection is possible. However, the local recurrence rate of GCT of the bone is higher than that of GCT at other sites owing to the associated surgical challenges, and treatment is often difficult. No study to date has reported long-term remission of recurrent tumors for more than 5 years by treatment with carbon ion beam radiotherapy after resection of GCT of the cervical spine. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 14-year-old boy who experienced recurrence after surgery for GCT of the cervical spine. DIAGNOSIS: The patient presented with cervical pain, and computed tomography revealed a mass of the C2 vertebral body. He underwent surgery for tumor resection and autologous bone grafting, and the final pathological diagnosis was GCT. The transplanted bone exhibited gradual progression of resorption, and recurrent tumors were observed on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging 1 year and 4 months after surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was started on denosumab at 15 years of age and received carbon ion beam therapy with 70.4 Gy administered in 32 sessions over 7 weeks. OUTCOMES: No progressive tumor growth was observed, there were no neurological symptoms such as paralysis or pain were noted, and the patient was in remission for 5 years after irradiation. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that carbon ion radiotherapy is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with recurrent GCT of the cervical spine.

Giant cell tumour of the sacrum: a suggested algorithm for treatment.

To investigate the outcome of our management of patients with giant cell tumour of the sacrum and draw lessons from this. A retrospective review of medical records and scans for all patients treated at our unit over the past 20 years with a giant cell tumour of the sacrum. Of the 517 patients treated at our unit for giant cell tumour over the past 20 years, only 9 (1.7%) had a giant cell tumour in the sacrum. Six were female, three male with a mean age of 34 (range 15-52). All, but two tumours involved the entire sacrum and there was only one purely distal to S3. The mean size was 10 cm and the most common symptom was back or buttock pain. Five had abnormal neurology at diagnosis, but only one presented with cauda equina syndrome. The first four patients were treated by curettage alone, but two patients had intraoperative cardiac arrests and although both survived all subsequent curettages were preceded by embolisation of the feeding vessels. Of the seven patients who had curettage, three developed local recurrence, but all were controlled with a combination of further embolisation, surgery or radiotherapy. One patient elected for treatment with radiotherapy and another had excision of the tumour distal to S3. All the patients are alive and only two patients have worse neurology than at presentation, one being impotent and one with stress incontinence. Three patients required spinopelvic fusion for sacral collapse. All patients are mobile and active at a follow-up between 2 and 21 years. Giant cell tumour of the sacrum can be controlled with conservative surgery rather than subtotal sacrectomy. The excision of small distal tumours is the preferred option, but for larger and more extensive tumours conservative management may well avoid morbidity whilst still controlling the tumour. Embolisation and curettage are the preferred first option with radiotherapy as a possible adjunct. Spinopelvic fusion may be needed when the sacrum collapses.

Recurrence after and complications associated with adjuvant treatments for sacral giant cell tumor.

BACKGROUND: The best treatment of giant cell tumor of the sacrum is controversial. It is unclear whether adjuvant treatment with intralesional surgery reduces recurrences or increases morbidity. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked whether adjuvants altered recurrence rates and complications after intralesional surgery for sacral giant cell tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 31 patients with sacral giant cell tumors treated with intralesional surgery with and without adjuvants. Survival to local recurrence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The differences in survival to local recurrence with and without adjuvants were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Complications were recorded from clinical records and images. The minimum followup was 36 months (median, 108 months; range, 36-276 months). RESULTS: Overall survival to local recurrence was 90% at 60 and 120 months. Survival to local recurrence with and without radiation was 91% and 89%, with and without embolization was 91% and 86%, and with and without local adjuvants was 88% and 92%, respectively. Adjuvants had no influence on local recurrence. Mortality was 6%: one patient died at 14 days postoperatively from a massive pulmonary embolism and another patient had radiation and died of a high-grade sarcoma. Fifteen of the 31 patients (48%) had one or more complications: eight patients (26%) had wound complications and seven patients (23%) had massive bleeding during curettage with hemodynamic instability. L5-S2 neurologic deficits decreased from 23% preoperatively to 13% postoperatively; S3-S4 deficits increased from 16% to 33%. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvants did not change the likelihood of local recurrence when combined with intralesional surgery but the complication rate was high.

Treatment and outcome of giant cell tumors of the pelvis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone rarely affect the pelvis. We report on 20 cases that have been treated at our institution during the last 20 years. METHODS: 20 patients with histologically benign GCT of the pelvis were included in this study. 9 tumors were primarily located in the iliosacral area, 6 in the acetabular area, and 5 in the ischiopubic area. 8 patients were treated by intralesional curettage and 6 by intralesional resection with additional curettage of the margins. 3 patients with iliacal tumors were treated by wide resection. 2 patients were treated by a combination of external beam irradiation and surgery, and 1 patient solely by irradiation. In addition, 9 patients received selective arterial embolization one day before surgery. Of the 6 patients with acetabular tumors, 1 secondarily received an endoprosthesis and 1 was primarily treated by hip transposition. The patients were followed for a median time of 3 (1-11) years. RESULTS: 1 patient with a pubic tumor developed a local recurrence 1 year after intralesional resection and additional curettage of the margins. The recurrence presented as a small soft tissue mass within the scar tissue of the gluteal muscles and was treated by resection. No secondary sarcoma was detected and none of the patients developed pulmonary metastases or multicentricity. No major complication occurred during surgery. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that most GCTs of the pelvis can be treated by intralesional procedures. For tumors of the iliac wing, wide resection can be an alternative. Surgical treatment of tumors affecting the acetabular region often results in functional impairment. Pre-surgical selective arterial embolization appears to be a safe procedure that may reduce the risk of local recurrence.

Comprehensive molecular imaging of malignant transformation of giant cell tumour of bone reveals diverse disease biology.

Malignant transformation of giant cell tumour of the bone is extremely rare. In addition, bone transformation in giant cell tumour may occur in different phases. With conventional X-rays, CT scans or MRIs, it may be challenging to distinguish among different phases of bone transformation, normal bone, soft tissue disease and bone disease (benign vs malignant lesions) and changes in multiple organs such as lung, liver and lymph nodes unless every lesion is biopsied, which is not practical. Molecular imaging with different isotopes (Tc-99m phosphonate, 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-d-glucose and sodium fluoride-18) may help to better characterise the disease. We hypothesised that molecular imaging could offer qualitative and quantitative characterisation of all stages of bone formation, destruction, reactivity or neoplasia in a patient with giant cell tumour of the bone, and we present the first case of molecular imaging where bone formation was seen in multiple soft tissues, such as lungs, muscles, lymph nodes and liver.

Giant cell tumour of bone in the denosumab era.

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is an intermediate locally aggressive primary bone tumour, occurring mostly at the meta-epiphysis of long bones. Overexpression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) by mononuclear neoplastic stromal cells promotes recruitment of numerous reactive multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells, causing lacunar bone resorption. Preferential treatment is curettage with local adjuvants such as phenol, alcohol or liquid nitrogen. The remaining cavity may be filled with bone graft or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement; benefits of the latter are a lower risk of recurrence, possibility of direct weight bearing and early radiographic detection of recurrences. Reported recurrence rates are comparable for the different local adjuvants (27-31%). Factors increasing the local recurrence risk include soft tissue extension and anatomically difficult localisations such as the sacrum. When joint salvage is impossible, en-bloc resection and endoprosthetic joint replacement may be performed. Local tumour control on the one hand and maintenance of a functional native joint and quality of life on the other hand are the main pillars of surgical treatment for this disease. Current knowledge and development in the fields of imaging, functional biology and systemic therapy are forcing us into a paradigm shift from a purely surgical approach towards a multidisciplinary approach. Systemic therapy with denosumab (RANKL inhibitor) or zoledronic acid (bisphosphonates) blocks, respectively inhibits, bone resorption by osteoclast-like giant cells. After use of zoledronic acid, stabilisation of local and metastatic disease has been reported, although the level of evidence is low. Denosumab is more extensively studied in two prospective trials, and appears effective for the optimisation of surgical treatment. Denosumab should be considered in the standard multidisciplinary treatment of advanced GCTB (e.g. cortical destruction, soft tissue extension, joint involvement or sacral localisation) to facilitate surgery at a later stage, and thereby aiming at immediate local control. Even though several questions concerning optimal treatment dose, duration and interval and drug safety remain unanswered, denosumab is among the most effective drug therapies in oncology.

Benign Tumors of the Spine: Has New Chemotherapy and Interventional Radiology Changed the Treatment Paradigm?

STUDY DESIGN: Clinically based systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of (A) medical treatment and (B) interventional radiology as either adjuvant or stand-alone treatment in primary benign bone tumors of the spine. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of spine surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists elaborated specific focused questions regarding aneurysmal bone cyst, giant cell tumor, and osteoid osteoma. Denosumab, bisphosphonate, interferon, bone marrow aspirate, doxycycline, thermal ablation, and selective arterial embolization were identified as areas of interest for the article. A systematic review was performed through MEDLINE and EMBASE. Recommendations based on the literature review and clinical expertise were issued using the GRADE system. RESULTS: The overall quality of the literature is very low with few multicenter prospective studies. For giant cell tumor, combination with Denosumab identified 14 pertinent articles with four multicenter prospective studies. Nine studies were found on bisphosphonates and six for selective arterial embolization. The search on aneurysmal bone cyst and selective arterial embolization revealed 12 articles. Combination with Denosumab, Doxycycline, and bone marrow aspirate identified four, two, and three relevant articles respectively. Eleven focused articles were selected on the role of thermal ablation in osteoid osteoma. CONCLUSION: Alternative and adjuvant therapy for primary benign bone tumors have emerged. Their ability to complement or replace surgery is now being scrutinized and they may impact significantly the algorithm of treatment of these tumors. Most of the data are still emerging and further research is desirable. Close collaboration between the different specialists managing these pathologies is crucial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Natural history of tumour-related sacral obliteration with nerve-root preservation.

Benign aggressive bone tumours can present a dilemma when the definitive treatment options necessitate enormous and permanent functional deficits. Here, we present a case of a massive sacral giant-cell tumour causing dramatic skeletal obliteration, which was successfully treated with radical radiotherapy rather than ablative surgery. The excellent functional outcome highlights the importance of nerve-root preservation in selecting treatment modalities.

[Lung dissemination of giant cell tumor of femur. The case report]. / Rozsiew do pluc guza olbrzymiokomórkowego kosci udowej. Opis przypadku.

The case of 32 years old patient suffering for giant cell bone tumor of left femur was reported. After surgery (curettage and filling of tumor bed with bone cement followed by arthroplasty), a dissemination to lungs was found. Patient was treated by palliative lungs radiotherapy (10 x 1.1 Gy) and six cycles of chemotherapy (every four weeks) based on cisplatin (35 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) obtaining significant regression of metastases. Because of four persistent lung metastases, the extracranial radiosurgery using one fraction of 16 Gy was done.

Long-term follow-up of efficacy and safety of megavoltage radiotherapy in high-risk giant cell tumors of bone.

PURPOSE: Giant cell tumors of the bone are rare and have variable presentations and natural history. There may be significant functional sequelae as a result of their locally aggressive nature or as a result of treatment. We reviewed the long-term results of radiotherapy for high risk giant cell tumors to assess: the efficacy of radiotherapy and the potential late toxicity of treatment, and to determine indications for radiation treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This report is a retrospective review of 21 localized giant cell tumors of the bone treated with radiotherapy between 1959 and 1991. Radiation was used in the primary management of 13 cases and for recurrent disease in eight cases. In the primary cases, two received radiotherapy as the sole modality (including a massive pelvic lesion and an advanced maxillary sinus tumor with orbital and pterygoid invasion), and in the other 11, 3 had gross residual disease following surgery and 8 had microscopic residual disease. Of eight recurrent cases, five were treated with radiotherapy alone and three with combined surgery and radiation. Sites of origin included extremity bones in nine cases, pelvis in six, spine in four, and skull in two. Extraosseous disease was apparent in 18 tumors and extended to contiguous structures in 14 (including four cases of spinal cord compression, three cases of sacral plexopathy, and one patient with temporal lobe invasion). The most common dose regimen was 35 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks (14 cases), with varying schedules for the remainder. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 15.4 years (2 to 35 years). Local control was achieved in 19 of 21 patients with radiotherapy. The two failures were subsequently salvaged for an ultimate control rate of 100%. One of the two radiotherapy failures was a marginal failure and was subsequently salvaged with combined surgery and radiotherapy. No patient died of giant cell tumor. Radiotherapy was well tolerated, with no serious late toxicity. There were no cases of malignant transformation or radiation-induced cancer. CONCLUSION: Long-term results in this series indicate that radiotherapy in modest doses (35 Gy in 15 fractions or equivalent) is a safe and effective option for primary and recurrent giant cell tumors of the bone. Radiotherapy should be used if surgery would result in significant functional morbidity and should be considered in select sites where the probability of recurrence is high and there is potential for significant morbidity from tumor relapse or subsequent surgery.

Radiation therapy in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone.

PURPOSE: To assess the local control rate and potential complications of radiotherapy, and the factors influencing response to radiotherapy for primary and locally recurrent giant cell tumor of bone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients were irradiated for giant cell tumor of bone between 1983 and 1993. Fourteen patients received radiotherapy at the time of primary diagnosis (10 had biopsy and 4 partial surgery) and 6 patients at the time of local recurrence (following additional surgery in 2). Fourteen patients had tumors of the extremity and six of the vertebral column. The radiotherapy dose ranged from 40-60 Gy in 15-30 fractions over 3-6 weeks. The response to radiotherapy was assessed by clinical and radiological criteria and the probable factors influencing response were analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 48 months (range, 4 months to 13 years). Local control was obtained in 18/20 patients. The two local failures were salvaged, one by reirradiation and the other by surgery. Only one patient died of giant cell tumor, following extensive bone marrow infiltration. There was no serious late toxicity or malignant transformation. The response to radiotherapy was not influenced by disease status at presentation, tumor site, radiotherapy schedule, or presence of soft tissue extension. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy is effective in producing local control in primary as well as recurrent giant cell tumor of bone. There are no major complications and no significant risk of malignant transformation. Radiotherapy could be considered as the primary treatment modality in patients where surgery would produce functional deficits.

Radiotherapy in the management of giant cell tumor of bone.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of patients with giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) treated with radiotherapy (RT) with or without surgical resection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective review of the records from 25 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed GCTB who had undergone RT between 1956 and 2000. RESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 11 to 69 years (median 32); 16 were female and 9 were male. The anatomic distribution of lesions was as follows: cervical spine, 3; temporal bone, 1; thoracic or lumbar spine, 9; sacrum, 8; ilium, 1, and humerus, radius, and thumb metacarpal, 1 each. Tumors ranged in size from 2 to 20 cm (median 9.5) at their maximal dimension. Thirteen patients had been referred for RT for primary GCTB and 12 had been referred with locally recurrent disease after having undergone one or more other treatments. Fourteen patients had undergone RT for gross disease, and the remaining 11 had been treated with RT after gross total resection. In 10 of these 11 patients, the treatment margins were positive or uncertain. Radiation doses ranged from 25 to 65 Gy (median 46). At a median follow-up of 8.8 years (range 0.67-34), 7 patients had developed isolated local recurrence, 2 had developed isolated distant recurrence, and 3 had developed both. The actuarial 5-year overall and disease-free survival rate was 91% and 58%, respectively, and the actuarial 5-year local control and distant metastasis-free survival rate was 62% and 81%, respectively. Univariate analysis suggested that treatment for recurrent disease correlated with a lower disease-free survival rate (83% vs. 33%, p = 0.06), distant metastasis-free survival rate (100% vs. 64%, p = 0.08), and local control rate (83% vs. 42%, p = 0.08) at 5 years. Of the 12 cases of recurrence, 7 were ultimately successfully treated with additional salvage therapy. In 4 of these patients, salvage therapy included interferon-alpha 2b. CONCLUSION: RT should be considered an adjuvant to surgery or as alternative therapy in cases of GCTB that are unresectable or in which excision would result in substantial functional deficits. When RT is used as primary therapy, the rate of local control seems to be satisfactory. In heavily pretreated patients, however, RT delivered as it was in this series can result in poor local control, and alternative therapies should be considered.

Synchronous multicentric giant cell tumour: a case report with review of literature.

Synchronous multicentric giant cell tumour (MGCT) is a rare occurrence. We report a young woman who presented with a synchronous skull and lower shaft femur giant cell tumour, who had previously received radiotherapy to both the sites, it being deemed inoperable at initial assessment.

Megavoltage radiation therapy for axial and inoperable giant-cell tumor of bone.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of giant-cell tumor of bone generally involves wide en bloc resection of the lesion and the surrounding bone or curettage with or without bone-grafting or the use of cement. Radiation therapy has been used for patients who cannot be operated on for medical reasons or who have a tumor that is technically difficult to resect or that cannot be resected because of its location. We performed the present study to evaluate the efficacy of megavoltage radiation in terms of lack of tumor progression and treatment-related morbidity. METHODS: Twenty patients who had giant-cell tumor of bone were managed with a single course of megavoltage radiation (forty to seventy gray administered at 1.8 to 2.0 gray per fraction with an average total duration of treatment of five to seven weeks) between March 1973 and March 1992. We used megavoltage photons, 160-megaelectron-volt proton beams, or a combination of the two. RESULTS: After a median duration of follow-up of 9.3 years, the tumor had not progressed in seventeen of the twenty patients. Thus, the actuarial ten-year rate for lack of progression was 85 percent. Local regrowth was evident in one patient who had received radiation alone and in two of the thirteen patients who had been managed with partial resection and radiation. Operative treatment was successful in the three patients in whom the radiation treatment had failed. No radiation-induced tumors were observed in our series. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that giant-cell tumor of bone was effectively treated with megavoltage radiation in our series of twenty patients in whom operative resection would have been difficult or was not feasible. The rate of tumors that did not progress with this regimen of radiation is similar to that reported by investigators from several other centers. Furthermore, these results closely rival those obtained with modern curettage procedures. Malignant sarcomatous transformation was not observed in our series. A longer duration of follow-up of a larger group of patients is necessary to provide a better estimate of the risk of malignant transformation.

Case report: giant cell tumour of metacarpals: report of three cases.

Giant cell tumour of the metacarpal bone is rare. We have encountered three cases during the last 30 years. Surgical treatment is difficult in such a critical site and is always associated with functional deformities and poor cosmesis. We have successfully treated two males and one female with lesions of the 1st, 2nd and 4th metacarpal bones using a Theratron-60 telecobalt machine. The radiation dose delivered was 50-55 Gy over 4.5-5 weeks. The three patients all tolerated radiotherapy treatment well, though moderate radiation dermatitis (Grade II-III) was seen. The regression of tumour mass started after about 2 months of radiation therapy and complete regression occurred after several months. The pain subsided immediately. Long follow up of 7-11 years revealed no signs of local recurrence, distant metastasis or radiation induced malignancy. The results of radiation therapy are excellent in terms of functional integrity and cosmesis.