Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Clinical evaluation of Fuji computed radiography (FCR) by physicians including non-radiologists].
Akita, S; Oda, J; Shiina, M; Sakai, K.
Affiliation
  • Akita S; Department of Radiology, Niigata University School of Medicine.
Rinsho Hoshasen ; 35(4): 483-8, 1990 Apr.
Article in Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2355649
ABSTRACT
In Niigata university hospital, most of conventional radiography were changed to FCR from July 1988. To evaluate its clinical utility, questionnaires relating to FCR image were distributed to all physicians including non-radiologists in the hospital after three months. The ratio of the physicians evaluated FCR image to be better than conventional image was 75% in chest radiography, 64% in abdominal radiography. FCR tomography of bone, joint, cranium and chest was also evaluated to be better than conventional by most of the physicians. Reduced size of the film and difficulty in detecting interstitial shadows of the lung were mentioned to be the fault of FCR.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiographic Image Enhancement Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: Ja Journal: Rinsho Hoshasen Year: 1990 Type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiographic Image Enhancement Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: Ja Journal: Rinsho Hoshasen Year: 1990 Type: Article