Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Heavy menstrual bleeding is an important health problem. Two frequently used therapies are the levonorgestrel intra-uterine system (LNG-IUS) and endometrial ablation. The LNG-IUS can be applied easily by the general practitioner, which saves costs, but has considerable failure rates. As an alternative, endometrial ablation is also very effective, but this treatment has to be performed by a gynaecologist. Due to lack of direct comparison of LNG-IUS with endometrial ablation, there is no evidence based preferred advice for the use of one of these treatment possibilities. METHOD/

DESIGN:

A multicenter randomised controlled trial, organised in a network infrastructure in the Netherlands in which general practitioners and gynaecologists collaborate. DISCUSSON This study, considering both effectiveness and cost effectiveness of LNG-IUS versus endometrial ablation may well improve care for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch trial register, number NTR2984.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Levonorgestrel / Contraceptive Agents, Female / Endometrial Ablation Techniques / Intrauterine Devices, Medicated Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMC Womens Health Journal subject: SAUDE DA MULHER Year: 2013 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Levonorgestrel / Contraceptive Agents, Female / Endometrial Ablation Techniques / Intrauterine Devices, Medicated Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMC Womens Health Journal subject: SAUDE DA MULHER Year: 2013 Type: Article