Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography by combined qualitative and quantitative analysis in breast lesions: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.
Wang, Lin; Du, Jing; Li, Feng-Hua; Fang, Hua; Hua, Jia; Wan, Cai-Feng.
Affiliation
  • Wang L; or Feng-Hua Li, Department of Ultrasound, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 1630 Dongfang Rd, 200127 Shanghai, China. drjingdu@163.com.
J Ultrasound Med ; 32(10): 1805-14, 2013 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24065262
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography for differentiation of breast lesions by combined qualitative and quantitative analyses in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Fifty-six patients with American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 to 5 breast lesions on conventional sonography were evaluated by contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI. A comparative analysis of diagnostic results between contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI was conducted in light of the pathologic findings. RESULTS: Pathologic analysis showed 26 benign and 30 malignant lesions. The predominant enhancement patterns of the benign lesions on contrast-enhanced sonography were homogeneous, centrifugal, and isoenhancement or hypoenhancement, whereas the patterns of the malignant lesions were mainly heterogeneous, centripetal, and hyperenhancement. The detection rates for perfusion defects and peripheral radial vessels in the malignant group were much higher than those in the benign group (P < .05). As to quantitative analysis, statistically significant differences were found in peak and time-to-peak values between the groups (P < .05). With pathologic findings as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI were 90.0%, 92.3%, 91.1% and 96.7%, 88.5%, and 92.9%, respectively. The two methods had a concordant rate of 87.5% (49 of 56), and the concordance test gave a value of κ = 0.75, indicating that there was high concordance in breast lesion assessment between the two diagnostic modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced sonography provided typical enhancement patterns and valuable quantitative parameters, which showed good agreement with MRI in diagnostic efficacy and may potentially improve characterization of breast lesions.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Phospholipids / Sulfur Hexafluoride / Algorithms / Breast Neoplasms / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Image Enhancement / Ultrasonography, Mammary Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Ultrasound Med Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Phospholipids / Sulfur Hexafluoride / Algorithms / Breast Neoplasms / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Image Enhancement / Ultrasonography, Mammary Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Ultrasound Med Year: 2013 Type: Article Affiliation country: China