Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A consensus review on the development of palliative care for patients with chronic and progressive neurological disease.
Oliver, D J; Borasio, G D; Caraceni, A; de Visser, M; Grisold, W; Lorenzl, S; Veronese, S; Voltz, R.
Affiliation
  • Oliver DJ; Palliative Medicine, Wisdom Hospice, Rochester, UK.
  • Borasio GD; University of Kent, Kent, UK.
  • Caraceni A; Service de soins palliatifs, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • de Visser M; Palliative Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Grisold W; European Palliative Care Research Center NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Lorenzl S; Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Veronese S; Department of Neurology, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Voltz R; Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Eur J Neurol ; 23(1): 30-8, 2016 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26423203
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

The European Association of Palliative Care Taskforce, in collaboration with the Scientific Panel on Palliative Care in Neurology of the European Federation of Neurological Societies (now the European Academy of Neurology), aimed to undertake a review of the literature to establish an evidence-based consensus for palliative and end of life care for patients with progressive neurological disease, and their families.

METHODS:

A search of the literature yielded 942 articles on this area. These were reviewed by two investigators to determine the main areas and the subsections. A draft list of papers supporting the evidence for each area was circulated to the other authors in an iterative process leading to the agreed recommendations.

RESULTS:

Overall there is limited evidence to support the recommendations but there is increasing evidence that palliative care and a multidisciplinary approach to care do lead to improved symptoms (Level B) and quality of life of patients and their families (Level C). The main areas in which consensus was found and recommendations could be made are in the early integration of palliative care (Level C), involvement of the wider multidisciplinary team (Level B), communication with patients and families including advance care planning (Level C), symptom management (Level B), end of life care (Level C), carer support and training (Level C), and education for all professionals involved in the care of these patients and families (Good Practice Point).

CONCLUSIONS:

The care of patients with progressive neurological disease and their families continues to improve and develop. There is a pressing need for increased collaboration between neurology and palliative care.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Societies, Medical / Terminal Care / Neurodegenerative Diseases / Consensus / Multiple Sclerosis / Neurology Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Neurol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Societies, Medical / Terminal Care / Neurodegenerative Diseases / Consensus / Multiple Sclerosis / Neurology Type of study: Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Neurol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom