Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ethics and health promotion practice: exploring attitudes and practices in Western Australian health organisations.
Reilly, T; Crawford, G; Lobo, R; Leavy, J; Jancey, J.
Affiliation
  • Reilly T; Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, WA 6845, Australia.
  • Crawford G; Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, WA 6845, Australia.
  • Lobo R; Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, WA 6845, Australia.
  • Leavy J; Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, WA 6845, Australia.
  • Jancey J; Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, WA 6845, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr ; 27(1): 54-60, 2016 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27041127
ABSTRACT
Issue addressed Evidence-informed practice underpinned by ethics is fundamental to developing the science of health promotion. Knowledge and application of ethical principles are competencies required for health promotion practice. However, these competencies are often inconsistently understood and applied. This research explored attitudes, practices, enablers and barriers related to ethics in practice in Western Australian health organisations. Methods Semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 health promotion practitioners, purposefully selected to provide a cross-section of government and non-government organisations. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and then themed. Results The majority of participants reported consideration of ethics in their practice; however, only half reported seeking Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) approval for projects in the past 12 months. Enablers identified as supporting ethics in practice and disseminating findings included support preparing ethics applications; resources and training about ethical practice; ability to access HRECs for ethics approval; and a supportive organisational culture. Barriers included limited time; insufficient resourcing and capacity; ethics approval not seen as part of core business; and concerns about academic writing. Conclusion The majority of participants were aware of the importance of ethics in practice and the dissemination of findings. However, participants reported barriers to engaging in formal ethics processes and to publishing findings. So what? Alignment of evidence-informed and ethics-based practice is critical. Resources and information about ethics may be required to support practice and encourage dissemination of findings, including in the peer-reviewed literature. Investigating the role of community-based ethics boards may be valuable to bridging the ethics-evidence gap.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Care Sector / Health Promotion Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Health Promot J Austr Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Care Sector / Health Promotion Type of study: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Health Promot J Austr Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia