Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial.
Harries, Tim; Eslambolchilar, Parisa; Rettie, Ruth; Stride, Chris; Walton, Simon; van Woerden, Hugo C.
Affiliation
  • Harries T; Kingston Business School, Kingston Hill Campus, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 7LB, United Kingdom.
  • Eslambolchilar P; Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
  • Rettie R; Kingston Business School, Kingston Hill Campus, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 7LB, United Kingdom.
  • Stride C; IWP, University of Sheffield, Conduit Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 1FL, United Kingdom.
  • Walton S; Oxford e-Research Centre, 7 Keble Road, Oxford, Oxon, OX1 3QG, United Kingdom.
  • van Woerden HC; NHS Highland, Assynt House, Beechwood Park, Inverness, IV2 3BW, United Kingdom. vanwoerdenh1@cf.ac.uk.
BMC Public Health ; 16: 925, 2016 09 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27590255
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Smartphones are ideal for promoting physical activity in those with little intrinsic motivation for exercise. This study tested three hypotheses H1 - receipt of social feedback generates higher step-counts than receipt of no feedback; H2 - receipt of social feedback generates higher step-counts than only receiving feedback on one's own walking; H3 - receipt of feedback on one's own walking generates higher step-counts than no feedback (H3).

METHODS:

A parallel group randomised controlled trial measured the impact of feedback on steps-counts. Healthy male participants (n = 165) aged 18-40 were given phones pre-installed with an app that recorded steps continuously, without the need for user activation. Participants carried these with them as their main phones for a two-week run-in and six-week trial. Randomisation was to three groups no feedback (control); personal feedback on step-counts; group feedback comparing step-counts against those taken by others in their group. The primary outcome measure, steps per day, was assessed using longitudinal multilevel regression analysis. Control variables included attitude to physical activity and perceived barriers to physical activity.

RESULTS:

Fifty-five participants were allocated to each group; 152 completed the study and were included in the

analysis:

n = 49, no feedback; n = 53, individual feedback; n = 50, individual and social feedback. The study provided support for H1 and H3 but not H2. Receipt of either form of feedback explained 7.7 % of between-subject variability in step-count (F = 6.626, p < 0.0005). Compared to the control, the expected step-count for the individual feedback group was 60 % higher (effect on log step-count = 0.474, 95 % CI = 0.166-0.782) and that for the social feedback group, 69 % higher (effect on log step-count = 0.526, 95 % CI = 0.212-0.840). The difference between the two feedback groups (individual vs social feedback) was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Always-on smartphone apps that provide step-counts can increase physical activity in young to early-middle-aged men but the provision of social feedback has no apparent incremental impact. This approach may be particularly suitable for inactive people with low levels of physical activity; it should now be tested with this population.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Smartphone / Obesity Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Exercise / Smartphone / Obesity Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom