Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Synthetic MRI in the Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Plaques.
Hagiwara, A; Hori, M; Yokoyama, K; Takemura, M Y; Andica, C; Tabata, T; Kamagata, K; Suzuki, M; Kumamaru, K K; Nakazawa, M; Takano, N; Kawasaki, H; Hamasaki, N; Kunimatsu, A; Aoki, S.
Affiliation
  • Hagiwara A; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.) ahagiwara-tky@umin.ac.jp.
  • Hori M; Department of Radiology (A.H., A.K.), Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yokoyama K; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Takemura MY; Neurology (K.Y.), Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Andica C; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Tabata T; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Kamagata K; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Suzuki M; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Kumamaru KK; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Nakazawa M; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Takano N; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Kawasaki H; Department of Radiological Sciences (M.N.), Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hamasaki N; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Kunimatsu A; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
  • Aoki S; From the Departments of Radiology (A.H., M.H., M.Y.T., C.A., T.T., K.K., M.S., K.K.K., M.N., N.T., H.K., N.H., S.A.).
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 38(2): 257-263, 2017 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27932506
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Synthetic MR imaging enables the creation of various contrast-weighted images including double inversion recovery and phase-sensitive inversion recovery from a single MR imaging quantification scan. Here, we assessed whether synthetic MR imaging is suitable for detecting MS plaques. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Quantitative and conventional MR imaging data on 12 patients with MS were retrospectively analyzed. Synthetic T2-weighted, FLAIR, double inversion recovery, and phase-sensitive inversion recovery images were produced after quantification of T1 and T2 values and proton density. Double inversion recovery images were optimized for each patient by adjusting the TI. The number of visible plaques was determined by a radiologist for a set of these 4 types of synthetic MR images and a set of conventional T1-weighted inversion recovery, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. Conventional 3D double inversion recovery and other available images were used as the criterion standard. The total acquisition time of synthetic MR imaging was 7 minutes 12 seconds and that of conventional MR imaging was 6 minutes 29 seconds The lesion-to-WM contrast and lesion-to-WM contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated and compared between synthetic and conventional double inversion recovery images.

RESULTS:

The total plaques detected by synthetic and conventional MR images were 157 and 139, respectively (P = .014). The lesion-to-WM contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio on synthetic double inversion recovery images were superior to those on conventional double inversion recovery images (P = .001 and < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Synthetic MR imaging enabled detection of more MS plaques than conventional MR imaging in a comparable acquisition time. The contrast for MS plaques on synthetic double inversion recovery images was better than on conventional double inversion recovery images.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Demyelinating Diseases / Multiple Sclerosis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Year: 2017 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Demyelinating Diseases / Multiple Sclerosis Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Year: 2017 Type: Article