Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer.
Dunn, J; Casey, C; Sandoe, D; Hyde, M K; Cheron-Sauer, M-C; Lowe, A; Oliffe, J L; Chambers, S K.
Affiliation
  • Dunn J; Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Qld, Australia.
  • Casey C; Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Darling Heights, Qld, Australia.
  • Sandoe D; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia.
  • Hyde MK; School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia.
  • Cheron-Sauer MC; Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
  • Lowe A; Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
  • Oliffe JL; Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Qld, Australia.
  • Chambers SK; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 27(2): e12644, 2018 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28145020
ABSTRACT
Across Australia, prostate cancer support groups (PCSG) have emerged to fill a gap in psychosocial care for men and their families. However, an understanding of the triggers and influencers of the PCSG movement is absent. We interviewed 21 SG leaders (19 PC survivors, two partners), of whom six also attended a focus group, about motivations, experiences, past and future challenges in founding and leading PCSGs. Thematic analysis identified four global themes illness experience; enacting a supportive response; forming a national collective and challenges. Leaders described men's feelings of isolation and neglect by the health system as the impetus for PCSGs to form and give/receive mutual help. Negotiating health care systems was an early challenge. National affiliation enabled leaders to build a united voice in the health system and establish a group identity and collective voice. Affiliation was supported by a symbiotic relationship with tensions between independence, affiliation and governance. Future challenges were group sustainability and inclusiveness. Study findings describe how a grassroots PCSG movement arose consistent with an embodied health movement perspective. Health care organisations who seek to leverage these community resources need to be cognisant of SG values and purpose if they are to negotiate effective partnerships that maximise mutual benefit.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Advocacy / Prostatic Neoplasms / Self-Help Groups / Social Support / Survivorship Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Advocacy / Prostatic Neoplasms / Self-Help Groups / Social Support / Survivorship Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Australia