Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transperineal gold marker implantation for image-guided external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer : A single institution, prospective study.
Jorgo, Kliton; Ágoston, Péter; Major, Tibor; Takácsi-Nagy, Zoltán; Polgár, Csaba.
Affiliation
  • Jorgo K; Centre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György u. 7-9, 1122, Budapest, Hungary. jorgokliton@gmail.com.
  • Ágoston P; Centre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György u. 7-9, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Major T; Centre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György u. 7-9, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Takácsi-Nagy Z; Centre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György u. 7-9, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Polgár C; Centre of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György u. 7-9, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 193(6): 452-458, 2017 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28154882
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To present the feasibility and complications of transperineal fiducial marker implantation in prostate cancer patients undergoing image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) METHODS AND MATERIALS Between November 2011 and April 2016, three radiopaque, gold-plated markers were transperineally implanted into the prostate of 300 patients under transrectal ultrasound guidance and with local anaesthesia. A week after the procedure patients filled in a questionnaire regarding pain, dysuria, urinary frequency, nocturia, rectal bleeding, hematuria, hematospermia or fever symptoms caused by the implantation. Pain was scored on a 1-10 scale, where score 1 meant very weak and score 10 meant unbearable pain. The implanted gold markers were used for daily verification and online correction of patients' setup during IGRT.

RESULTS:

Based on the questionnaires no patient experienced fever, infection, dysuria or rectal bleeding after implantation. Among the 300 patients, 12 (4%) had hematospermia, 43 (14%) hematuria, which lasted for an average of 3.4 and 1.8 days, respectively. The average pain score was 4.6 (range 0-9). Of 300 patients 87 (29%) felt any pain after the intervention, which took an average of 1.5 days. None of the patients needed analgesics after implantation. Overall, 105 patients (35%) reported less, 80 patients (27%) more, and 94 patients (31%) equal amount of pain during marker implantation compared to biopsy. The 21 patients who had a biopsy performed under general anesthesia did not answer this question.

CONCLUSION:

Transperineal gold marker implantation under local anesthesia was well tolerated. Complications were limited; rate and frequency of perioperative pain was comparable to the pain caused by biopsy. The method can be performed safely in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Radiotherapy, Conformal / Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / Fiducial Markers / Radiotherapy, Image-Guided / Gold Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / RADIOTERAPIA Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Hungary

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Radiotherapy, Conformal / Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / Fiducial Markers / Radiotherapy, Image-Guided / Gold Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / RADIOTERAPIA Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Hungary