Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomised, controlled trial evaluating a low cost, 3D-printed bronchoscopy simulator.
Pedersen, T H; Gysin, J; Wegmann, A; Osswald, M; Ott, S R; Theiler, L; Greif, R.
Affiliation
  • Pedersen TH; Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Gysin J; Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Wegmann A; Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Osswald M; Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Ott SR; Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Theiler L; Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
  • Greif R; Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Anaesthesia ; 72(8): 1005-1009, 2017 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28603907
Low-fidelity, simulation-based psychomotor skills training is a valuable first step in the educational approach to mastering complex procedural skills. We developed a cost-effective bronchial tree simulator based on a human thorax computed tomography scan using rapid-prototyping (3D-print) technology. This randomised, single-blind study evaluated how realistic our 3D-printed simulator would mimic human anatomy compared with commercially available bronchial tree simulators (Laerdal® Airway Management Trainer with Bronchial Tree and AirSim Advance Bronchi, Stavanger, Norway). Thirty experienced anaesthetists and respiratory physicians used a fibreoptic bronchoscope to rate each simulator on a visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 mm = completely unrealistic anatomy, 100 mm = indistinguishable from real patient) for: localisation of the right upper lobe bronchial lumen; placement of a bronchial blocker in the left main bronchus; aspiration of fluid from the right lower lobe; and overall realism. The 3D-printed simulator was rated most realistic for the localisation of the right upper lobe bronchial lumen (p = 0.002), but no differences were found in placement of a bronchial blocker or for aspiration of fluid (p = 0.792 and p = 0.057) compared with using the commercially available simulators. Overall, the 3D-printed simulator was rated most realistic (p = 0.021). Given the substantially lower costs for the 3D-printed simulator (£85 (€100/US$110) compared with > ~ £2000 (€2350/US$2590) for the commercially available simulators), our 3D-printed simulator provides an inexpensive alternative for learning bronchoscopy skills, and offers the possibility of practising procedures on patient-specific models before attempting them in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bronchoscopy / Printing, Three-Dimensional / Simulation Training Type of study: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Anaesthesia Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bronchoscopy / Printing, Three-Dimensional / Simulation Training Type of study: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Anaesthesia Year: 2017 Type: Article Affiliation country: Switzerland