Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decisional control preferences among patients with advanced cancer: An international multicenter cross-sectional survey.
Yennurajalingam, Sriram; Rodrigues, Luis Fernando; Shamieh, Omar M; Tricou, Colombe; Filbet, Marilène; Naing, Kyaw; Ramaswamy, Akhileshwaran; Perez-Cruz, Pedro Emilio; Bautista, Mary Jocylyn S; Bunge, Sofia; Muckaden, Mary Ann; Fakrooden, Sarah; Sewram, Vikash; Tejedor, Antonio Noguera; Rao, Shobha S; Williams, Janet L; Liu, Diane D; Park, Minjeong; Lu, Zhanni; Cantu, Hilda; Hui, David; Reddy, Suresh K; Bruera, Eduardo.
Affiliation
  • Yennurajalingam S; 1 Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Rodrigues LF; 2 Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
  • Shamieh OM; 3 King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
  • Tricou C; 4 Centre Hospitalier de Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Filbet M; 4 Centre Hospitalier de Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Naing K; 5 HCA Hospice care, Singapore.
  • Ramaswamy A; 5 HCA Hospice care, Singapore.
  • Perez-Cruz PE; 6 Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Bautista MJS; 7 Benavides Cancer Institute, Manila, Philippines.
  • Bunge S; 8 Programa Argentino De Medicina, Olavaria, Argentina.
  • Muckaden MA; 9 Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
  • Fakrooden S; 10 Highway Hospice, Durban, South Africa.
  • Sewram V; 11 University of Stellenbosch, Capetown, South Africa.
  • Tejedor AN; 12 Hospital Centro de Cuidados Laguna, Madrid, Spain.
  • Rao SS; 13 LBJ Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Williams JL; 1 Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Liu DD; 1 Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Park M; 1 Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Lu Z; 1 Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Cantu H; 1 Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Hui D; 1 Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Reddy SK; 1 Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Bruera E; 1 Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Palliat Med ; 32(4): 870-880, 2018 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29235415
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Understanding patients' decision control preferences is important in providing quality cancer care. Patients' decisional control preference can be either active (patients prefer to make decisions themselves), shared (collaborative between patient, their physician, and/or family), or passive (patients prefer that the decisions are made by either the physician and/or their family).

AIM:

To determine the frequency and predictors of passive decision control preferences among advanced cancer patients. We also determined the concordance between actual decision-making and decision control preferences and its association with patient satisfaction.

DESIGN:

In this cross-sectional survey of advanced cancer patients referred to palliative care across 11 countries, we evaluated sociodemographic variables, Control Preference Scale, and satisfaction with the decisions and care.

RESULTS:

A total of 1490 participants were evaluable. Shared, active, and passive decision control preferences were 33%, 44%, and 23%, respectively. Passive decision control preferences (odds ratio, p value) was more frequent in India (4.34, <0.001), Jordan (3.41, <0.001), and France (3.27, <0.001). Concordance between the actual decision-making and decision control preferences was highest in the United States ( k = 0.74) and lowest in Brazil (0.34). Passive decision control preference was significantly associated with (odds ratio per point, p value) better performance status (0.99/point, 0.017), higher education (0.64, 0.001), and country of origin (Brazil (0.26, <0.0001), Singapore (0.25, 0.0003), South Africa (0.32, 0.0002), and Jordan (2.33, 0.0037)).

CONCLUSION:

Passive decision control preferences were less common (23%) than shared and active decision control preference even among developing countries. Significant predictors of passive decision control preferences were performance status, education, and country of origin.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Participation / Decision Making / Patient Preference / Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Palliat Med Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Participation / Decision Making / Patient Preference / Neoplasms Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Palliat Med Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States