Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rasch analysis suggested that items from the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist can be summed to create a score.
Yamato, Tie P; Maher, Chris G; Saragiotto, Bruno T; Catley, Mark J; Moseley, Anne M.
Affiliation
  • Yamato TP; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: tie.yamato@sydney.edu.au.
  • Maher CG; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Saragiotto BT; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Catley MJ; Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Moseley AM; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 101: 28-34, 2018 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29793002
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to construct and evaluate a summary score of reporting completeness based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). STUDY DESIGN AND

SETTING:

We included 200 reports published in 2013 randomly selected from the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. We summed the scores for the 12 items for the intervention and control groups for each trial to create a summary score from 0 to 24. Rasch analysis was used to investigate the item hierarchy, category function and reliability of the TIDieR checklist and determine the extent to which the summary score can be considered an interval-level measure.

RESULTS:

The data fit the Rasch model suggesting the summary score is able to assess the completeness of reporting. The items appeared to target the study sample well (average report measure was 0.48 [0.87] compared to the average item measure of 0.0 [1.82]), and progressed in a logical manner, suggesting the summary score can be used as a single variable. The low internal consistency (0.62) suggests the summary score may only be able to discriminate between the least and most detailed reports.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results support the use of the TIDieR summary score; however, we encourage the replication of our study in an independent data set.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Reproducibility of Results / Checklist Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Year: 2018 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Reproducibility of Results / Checklist Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Journal subject: EPIDEMIOLOGIA Year: 2018 Type: Article