Motor function tests for 0-2-year-old children - a systematic review.
Dan Med J
; 65(6)2018 Jun.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-29886879
INTRODUCTION: There is no evidence on how motor function is best evaluated in children in a low-risk setting. The method used in the Danish Preventive Child Health Examination Programme (DPCHEP) in general practise has not been validated. The objective of this review was to identify existing motor function tests for 0-2-year-old children that were validated for use in the background population and which are suitable for use in the DPCHEP. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, SwedMed, PsycInfo and CINAHL in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Five motor function tests were identified. The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) exclusively assesses motor function, the Harris Infant Neuromotor Assessment also assesses cognition and the Early Motor Questionnaire (EMQ) additionally assesses perception-action integration skills. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) and The Brigance Infant and Toddler Screen include further aspects of development. All test methods, except for the AIMS, are based on parent involvement. CONCLUSIONS: For implementation in the DPCHEP, five motor function tests were potentially adequate. However, the time consumption and extensive use of tools render three of the five tests unsuitable for implementation in the existing programme. The two remaining tests, the ASQ and the EMQ, are parent questionnaires. We suggest that these should be pilot tested with a view to their subsequent implementation in the DPCHEP. It may be considered to present the test elements in a more manageable and systematic way, possibly with illustrations.
Search on Google
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Physical Examination
/
Exercise Test
/
Motor Skills
Type of study:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Qualitative_research
/
Systematic_reviews
Limits:
Child, preschool
/
Humans
/
Infant
/
Newborn
Language:
En
Journal:
Dan Med J
Year:
2018
Type:
Article