Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation exposure to the surgeon during minimally invasive spine procedures is directly estimated by patient dose.
Harrison Farber, S; Nayar, Gautam; Desai, Rupen; Reiser, Elizabeth W; Byrd, Sarah A; Chi, Deborah; Idler, Cary; Isaacs, Robert E.
Affiliation
  • Harrison Farber S; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
  • Nayar G; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
  • Desai R; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Reiser EW; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
  • Byrd SA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
  • Chi D; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
  • Idler C; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
  • Isaacs RE; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. Robert.isaacs@duke.edu.
Eur Spine J ; 27(8): 1911-1917, 2018 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948320
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Radiation exposure is a necessary component of minimally invasive spine procedures to augment limited visualization of anatomy. The surgeon's exposure to ionizing radiation is not easily recognizable without a digital dosimeter-something few surgeons have access to. The aim of this study was to identify an easy alternative method that uses the available radiation dose data from the C-arm to accurately predict physician exposure.

METHODS:

The senior surgeon wore a digital dosimeter during all minimally invasive spine fusion procedures performed over a 12-month period. Patient demographics, procedure information, and radiation exposure throughout the procedure were recorded.

RESULTS:

Fifty-five minimally invasive spine fusions utilizing 330 percutaneous screws were included. Average radiation dose was 0.46 Rad/screw to the patient. Average radiation exposure to the surgeon was 1.06 ± 0.71 µSv/screw, with a strong positive correlation (r = 0.77) to patient dose. The coefficient of determination (r2) was 0.5928, meaning almost two-thirds of the variability in radiation exposure to the surgeon is explained by radiation exposure to the patient.

CONCLUSIONS:

Intra-operative radiation exposure to the patient, which is easily identifiable as a continuously updated fluoroscopic monitor, is a reliable predictor of radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous screw placement in minimally invasive spinal fusion surgery and therefore can provide an estimate of exposure without the use of a dosimeter. With this, a surgeon can better understand the magnitude of their exposure on a case-by-case basis rather than on a quarterly basis, or more likely, not at all. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion / Fluoroscopy / Occupational Exposure / Radiation Exposure / Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Surgeons Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur Spine J Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fusion / Fluoroscopy / Occupational Exposure / Radiation Exposure / Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Surgeons Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Eur Spine J Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States