Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment with inferior breaks: VIPER Study Report No. 3.
Baumgarten, Sabine; Schiller, Petra; Hellmich, Martin; Walter, Peter; Agostini, Hansjürgen; Junker, Bernd; Helbig, Horst; Lommatzsch, Albrecht; Mazinani, Babac.
Affiliation
  • Baumgarten S; Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. sabaumgarten@ukaachen.de.
  • Schiller P; Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Hellmich M; Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Walter P; Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
  • Agostini H; Eye Center, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Junker B; University Eye Hospital, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Helbig H; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Lommatzsch A; Department of Ophthalmology, Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany.
  • Mazinani B; Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 256(11): 2069-2073, 2018 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30140963
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To test if an encircling band improves outcomes in vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD) with inferior or with multiple (4 or more) breaks.

METHODS:

Subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial in patients with uncomplicated PRD assigned either to 20 G vitrectomy plus encircling band (group E1), or 20 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group C), or 23/25 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group E2). The primary endpoint was defined as no indication for any retina reattaching procedure during the review period of 6 months. One hundred out of 257 patients were identified with inferior breaks and 63 patients had 4 or more breaks.

RESULTS:

In patients with retinal breaks between 500 and 700, treatment was successful in 77.4% (24/31, treatment arm E1) versus 57.1% (16/28, treatment arm C) (p = 0.301, odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 7.17). In patients with multiple breaks, success rates were 68.2% (15/22, E1) versus. 72.4% (21/29, C, p = 0.46, OR 0.52, CI 0.08-3.65).

CONCLUSION:

Combining an encircling band with vitrectomy in patients with pseudophakic retinal detachment and inferior or multiple breaks does not significantly improve primary anatomical success in comparison to treatment with 20 G or 23/25 G vitrectomy alone.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Retinal Perforations / Scleral Buckling / Vitrectomy / Retinal Detachment / Pseudophakia Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Retinal Perforations / Scleral Buckling / Vitrectomy / Retinal Detachment / Pseudophakia Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany