Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Delphi consultation to assess indicators of readiness to provide quality health facility-based lymphoedema management services.
Walsh, Victoria L; Fox, LeAnne M; Brady, Molly; King, Jonathan; Worrell, Caitlin M.
Affiliation
  • Walsh VL; Parasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Fox LM; Parasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  • Brady M; RTI International, Department of Global Health, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • King J; Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Worrell CM; Parasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 12(9): e0006699, 2018 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30226868
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The World Health Organization (WHO) in collaboration with partners is developing a toolkit of resources to guide lymphatic filariasis (LF) morbidity management and disability prevention (MMDP) implementation and evaluation. Direct health facility inspection is the preferred method for documenting the readiness of a country programme to provide quality lymphoedema management services, one of the three MMDP criteria used to demonstrate the elimination of LF as a public health problem. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

FINDINGS:

As component of tool development, a Delphi consultation was implemented to gain consensus on six proposed domains and fourteen proposed tracer indicators to measure national programme readiness to provide quality health facility-based lymphoedema management services. A seven-point Likert-type scale was used to rank the importance of proposed domains and tracer indicators. Consensus for inclusion of the indicator was defined a priori as 70% or more of respondents ranking the proposed indicator in the top three tiers (5-7). Purposive sampling was used to select 43 representative experts including country representatives, programme implementers, and technical experts. A 55.8% response rate (n = 24) was achieved for the survey. Analysis of the responses demonstrated that consensus for inclusion had been reached for all proposed domains including trained staff (mean = 6.9, standard deviation (SD) = 0.34), case management and education materials (mean = 6.1, SD = 0.65), water infrastructure (mean = 6.3, SD = 0.81), medicines and commodities (mean = 6.3, SD = 0.69), patient tracking system (mean = 6.3, SD = 0.85), and staff knowledge (mean = 6.5, SD = 0.66).

SIGNIFICANCE:

The Delphi consultation provided an efficient and structured method for gaining consensus among lymphatic filariasis experts around key lymphoedema management quality indicators. The results from this analysis were used to refine the indicators included within the direct inspection protocol tool to ensure its ability to assess health facility readiness to provide quality lymphoedema management services.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Health Care / Disease Management / Health Services Research / Lymphedema Type of study: Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Journal subject: MEDICINA TROPICAL Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Health Care / Disease Management / Health Services Research / Lymphedema Type of study: Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Journal subject: MEDICINA TROPICAL Year: 2018 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States