Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery: Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies.
Stover, Angela M; Tompkins Stricker, Carrie; Hammelef, Karen; Henson, Sydney; Carr, Philip; Jansen, Jennifer; Deal, Allison M; Bennett, Antonia V; Basch, Ethan M.
Affiliation
  • Stover AM; Department of Health Policy and Management.
  • Tompkins Stricker C; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Hammelef K; Carevive Systems Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
  • Henson S; Carevive Systems Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
  • Carr P; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Jansen J; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Deal AM; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Bennett AV; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Basch EM; Department of Health Policy and Management.
Med Care ; 57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1: S92-S99, 2019 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30985602
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures used during cancer care delivery improve communication about symptoms between patients and clinicians and reduce service utilization for uncontrolled symptoms. However, uptake of PROs in routine cancer care has been slow. In this paper, we describe stakeholder engagement activities used to overcome barriers to implementing PROs. Implementation occurred in 2 study settings PROs completed in the waiting room and reviewed during clinical visits to guide symptom management for multiple myeloma (visit-based PROs); and weekly PROs completed by cancer patients between chemotherapy visits to monitor symptoms at home (remote PROs).

METHODS:

PRO implementation steps across studies included (1) clinician and patient input on key symptoms, PRO measures, and identifying which PRO responses are clinically concerning to better target nursing actions; (2) developing PRO-based clinical decision support (CDS) for responding to concerning PROs; (3) training clinicians and clinical research assistants to interpret PROs and use software; and (4) describing implementation impact (frequency of concerning PRO responses and nursing actions).

DISCUSSION:

Clinician and patient input was critical for identifying key symptoms, PRO measures, and clinically concerning response options. For the visit-based PRO observational study, all symptom scores appeared on a clinician dashboard, and those rated ≥1 by patients (on a 0-4 or 0-10 scale) had PRO-based CDS available for access. For the 2 remote PROs trials, stakeholders recommended that the 2 "worst" response options (eg, PRO responses of "often"/"always" or "severe"/"very severe") would trigger an automated email alert to a nurse along with PRO-based CDS. In each study, PRO-based CDS was tailored based on clinician input. Across studies, the most common nursing response to concerning PROs was counseling patients on (or providing care plans for) self-management of symptoms. In the trials, the percentage of weekly remote PROs generating an alert to a nurse ranged from 13% at an academic center to 36% in community oncology practices. KEY POINTS Across 3 prospective studies, PROs implemented into cancer care enabled tailored care based on issues identified on PROs. Stakeholder engagement was critical for successful implementation. This paper assists in addressing important PRO implementation challenges by describing a stakeholder-driven approach.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Reported Outcome Measures / Stakeholder Participation / Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med Care Year: 2019 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Reported Outcome Measures / Stakeholder Participation / Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Med Care Year: 2019 Type: Article