Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating Propofol Concentration in Blood From Exhaled Gas Using a Breathing-Related Partition Coefficient.
Dong, Hao; Zhang, Fengjiang; Chen, Jing; Yu, Qiwen; Zhong, Yinbo; Liu, Jun; Yan, Min; Chen, Xing.
Affiliation
  • Dong H; From the Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Zhang F; Research Institute of Zhejiang University-Taizhou, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Chen J; Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Yu Q; From the Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Zhong Y; From the Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Liu J; Research Institute of Zhejiang University-Taizhou, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Yan M; Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Chen X; From the Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Anesth Analg ; 130(4): 958-966, 2020 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31124837
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The anesthetic side effects of propofol still occur in clinical practice because no reliable monitoring techniques are available. In this regard, continuous monitoring of propofol in breath is a promising method, yet it remains infeasible because there is large variation in the blood/exhaled gas partial pressure ratio (RBE) in humans. Further evaluations of the influences of breathing-related factors on RBE would mitigate this variation.

METHODS:

Correlations were analyzed between breathing-related factors (tidal volume [TV], breath frequency [BF], and minute ventilation [VM]) and RBE in 46 patients. Furthermore, a subset of 10 patients underwent pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and the parameters of the PFTs were then compared with the RBE. We employed a 1-phase exponential decay model to characterize the influence of VM on RBE. We also proposed a modified RBE (RBEM) that was not affected by the different breathing patterns of the patients. The blood concentration of propofol was predicted from breath monitoring using RBEM and RBE.

RESULTS:

We found a significant negative correlation (R = -0.572; P < .001) between VM and RBE (N = 46). No significant correlation was shown between PFTs and RBE in the subset (N = 10). RBEM demonstrated a standard Gaussian distribution (mean, 1.000; standard deviation [SD], 0.308). Moreover, the predicted propofol concentrations based on breath monitoring matched well with the measured blood concentrations. The 90% prediction band was limited to within ±1 µg·mL.

CONCLUSIONS:

The prediction of propofol concentration in blood was more accurate using RBEM than when using RBE and could provide reference information for anesthesiologists. Moreover, the present study provided a general approach for assessing the influence of relevant physiological factors and will inform noninvasive and accurate breath assessment of volatile drugs or metabolites in blood.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breath Tests / Propofol / Anesthetics, Intravenous Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Anesth Analg Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breath Tests / Propofol / Anesthetics, Intravenous Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Anesth Analg Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: China