Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of intraoperative specimen radiography as margin assessment tool in breast conserving surgery.
Funk, Annika; Heil, Jörg; Harcos, Aba; Gomez, Christina; Stieber, Anne; Junkermann, Hans; Hennigs, André; Rauch, Geraldine; Sinn, H-P; Riedel, Fabian; Schäfgen, Benedikt; Hug, Sarah; Maier, Anna; Blumenstein, Maria; Domschke, Christoph; Schott, Sarah; Wallwiener, Markus; Rom, Joachim; Schütz, Florian; Sohn, Christof; Golatta, Michael.
Affiliation
  • Funk A; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Heil J; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Harcos A; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Gomez C; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Stieber A; Department of Radiology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Junkermann H; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Hennigs A; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Rauch G; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-University Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany.
  • Sinn HP; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  • Riedel F; Department of Pathology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schäfgen B; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Hug S; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Maier A; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Blumenstein M; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Domschke C; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schott S; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Wallwiener M; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Rom J; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schütz F; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Sohn C; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Golatta M; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 179(2): 425-433, 2020 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31654190
PURPOSE: To explore the ability of intraoperative specimen radiography (SR) to correctly identify positive margins in patients receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS). To assess whether the reoperation rate can be reduced by using this method. METHODS: This retrospective study included 470 consecutive cases receiving BCS due to a primarily diagnosed breast cancer. SR was carried out in two planes, assessing the specimen regarding the presence of the lesion and its relation to all margins. If indicated, re-excision of selective orientations was advised. Under consideration of gross inspection and the SR-findings, it was up to the surgeon whether to perform re-resections. The recommendations for re-excision were, separately for each orientation, compared to the histopathological results, serving as gold standard. RESULTS: Intraoperative SR was performed in 470 cases, thus 2820 margins were assessed. Of those, 2510 (89.0%) were negative and 310 (11.0%) positive. SR identified 2179 (77.3%) margins correctly as negative, whereas 331 (11.7%) clear margins were misjudged as positive. Of 310 infiltrated margins, SR identified 114 (4.0%) correctly, whereas 196 (7.0%) infiltrated margins were missed. This resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 36.8%/86.8% and PPV/NPV of 25.6%/91.8%. Through targeted re-resections positive margins could be reduced by 31.0% [310 to 214 (7.6%)]. On case level, the rate of secondary procedures could be reduced by 37.0% [from 162 to 102 (21.7%)]. CONCLUSIONS: SR is a helpful tool to identify infiltrated margins and to reduce the rate of secondary surgeries by recommending targeted re-excisions of according orientations in order to obtain a final negative margin status.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Radiography / Mastectomy, Segmental / Intraoperative Care Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Radiography / Mastectomy, Segmental / Intraoperative Care Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany