Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Augmentation Phalloplasty for Acquired Penile Shortening: A Systematic Review of Techniques, Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Limitations.
Abu-Ghname, Amjed; Banuelos, Joseph; Davis, Matthew J; Kreutz-Rodrigues, Lucas; Morrison, Shane D; Vyas, Krishna S.
Affiliation
  • Abu-Ghname A; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: Amjed.abu-ghname@bcm.edu.
  • Banuelos J; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Davis MJ; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Kreutz-Rodrigues L; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Morrison SD; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Vyas KS; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Sex Med ; 17(2): 331-341, 2020 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31831387
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Although an infrequent cause of small penile size in adult men, acquired penile shortening represents a particular reconstructive challenge due to preexisting penile anatomic deformities.

AIM:

With numerous techniques being performed, the purpose of our study is to assess available literature on length enhancement procedures used for acquired penile shortening deformities.

METHODS:

A systematic review was performed using the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses. Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Databases were used to identify papers on augmentation Phalloplasty in non-transgender males with acquired penile shortening from 1990 to 2018. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Outcomes, complications, and patient-reported satisfaction were analyzed.

RESULTS:

12 articles, involving 931 patients and 8 primary procedures, met our inclusion criteria. The majority of articles had level of evidence of 4 (83%) and Newcastle Ottawa Scale score of 6 (92%, moderate risk of bias). All studies reported mean penile length gain; however, inconsistent methodology was used when measuring penile dimensions. Mean length gain ranged from 0.6 to 6.4 cm. Overall, the mean complication rate for all techniques ranged from 0% to 50%. Post-operative satisfaction was reported in 10 (83%) studies, 7 of which used a validated scale. Patients were generally satisfied, with reported satisfaction rates ranging from 77% to 100%. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS While numerous procedures have been described, the significant limitations in the available data preclude identifying a single superior procedure. STRENGTHS &

LIMITATIONS:

The significant heterogeneity in the reported literature is a limitation of this study and highlights the need for standardized reporting. However, this study is the first to analyze augmentation phalloplasty literature in the setting of acquired penile shortening.

CONCLUSION:

Augmentation phalloplasty techniques for acquired penile shortening are evolving and are continuously being modified; best-practice guidelines are crucial to achieve safe and satisfactory outcomes in this population. Abu-Ghname A, Banuelos J, Davis MJ, et al. Augmentation Phalloplasty for Acquired Penile Shortening A Systematic Review of Techniques, Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction, and Limitations. J Sex Med 2020;17331-341.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Penis / Patient Satisfaction / Plastic Surgery Procedures Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Sex Med Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Penis / Patient Satisfaction / Plastic Surgery Procedures Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Adult / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Sex Med Journal subject: GINECOLOGIA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article