Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Latinas' knowledge of and experiences with genetic cancer risk assessment: Barriers and facilitators.
Gómez-Trillos, Sara; Sheppard, Vanessa B; Graves, Kristi D; Song, Minna; Anderson, Lyndsay; Ostrove, Nancy; Lopez, Katherine; Campos, Claudia; Gonzalez, Nathaly; Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Alejandra.
Affiliation
  • Gómez-Trillos S; Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Sheppard VB; The Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Graves KD; Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Song M; Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Anderson L; The Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Ostrove N; Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Lopez K; Department of Nursing, California State University, Sacramento, California.
  • Campos C; EXPRE, LLC, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  • Gonzalez N; Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Hurtado-de-Mendoza A; Nueva Vida DC Office, Alexandria, Virginia.
J Genet Couns ; 29(4): 505-517, 2020 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31883202
ABSTRACT
Disparities in genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) uptake persist between Latinas and Non-Hispanic Whites. This study utilized a mental model approach to interview 20 Latinas (10 affected, 10 unaffected) at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Participants were asked about their knowledge and perceptions of GCRA, HBOC, risk, benefits, motivators, barriers, challenges, and experiences with GCRA. Using the Consensual Qualitative Analysis Framework, two authors independently coded the interviews and applied the final codes upon consensus. Additionally, interviews were coded to identify whether participants spontaneously brought up certain topics without a prompt. Findings identified multiple barriers and facilitators to GCRA uptake in this population, including patient level psychosocial/cultural factors (e.g., limited knowledge, worry about relatives' risk) and healthcare system factors (e.g., receiving no referrals). There were notable differences in awareness and knowledge between affected and unaffected women (e.g., genetic testing awareness), as well as knowledge gaps that were evident in both groups (e.g., age of diagnosis as a risk factor). To reduce disparities in GCRA uptake, interventions should address identified facilitators and barriers. Differences in knowledge and awareness between affected and unaffected women support the development of targeted interventions that address specific knowledge gaps. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03075540) by Alejandra Hurtado de Mendoza, Ph.D.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Breast Neoplasms / Hispanic or Latino / Genetic Testing / Genetic Predisposition to Disease Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Genet Couns Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / Breast Neoplasms / Hispanic or Latino / Genetic Testing / Genetic Predisposition to Disease Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Genet Couns Journal subject: GENETICA MEDICA Year: 2020 Type: Article