Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automated quantification of Epstein-Barr virus in whole blood for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders monitoring.
Salmona, Maud; Stefic, Karl; Mahjoub, Nadia; de Fontbrune, Flore Sicre; Maylin, Sarah; Simon, François; Scieux, Catherine; Socié, Gérard; Mazeron, Marie-Christine; LeGoff, Jérôme.
Affiliation
  • Salmona M; Université de Paris Diderot, INSERM U976, Paris, France. maud.salmona@aphp.fr.
  • Stefic K; Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France. maud.salmona@aphp.fr.
  • Mahjoub N; Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France.
  • de Fontbrune FS; Université de Tours, INSERM U1259, Tours, France.
  • Maylin S; Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France.
  • Simon F; Hematology and Transplantation Unit, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France.
  • Scieux C; Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France.
  • Socié G; Université de Paris Diderot, INSERM U976, Paris, France.
  • Mazeron MC; Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France.
  • LeGoff J; Université de Paris Diderot, INSERM U976, Paris, France.
Virol J ; 17(1): 20, 2020 02 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32014036
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Standardized and sensitive assays for Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) are needed to define universal cutoff for treatment initiation in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplant recipients. In a context of accreditation and the availability of EBV international standard, we evaluated the Abbott RealTime EBV (RT) assay for EBV quantification in whole blood.

METHODS:

The RT assay was compared on 282 prospective clinical samples with the Artus EBV PCR Kit V1 assay (V1) and we analyzed the kinetics of EBV load in 11 patients receiving rituximab treatment.

RESULTS:

The estimated limit of detection was 88 IU/mL. The assay was linear (r2 = 0.9974) in the range of all samples tested (100 to 1,000,000 IU/mL). Intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) ranged between 0.35 and 1.35%, and inter-assay CV between 3.40 and 4.5%. On samples above the limit of quantification, the two assays were strongly correlated. EBV RT values were on average 0.30 log10 IU/mL lower than those measured with the V1 assay. In patients treated with rituximab, the RT assay remained positive in 5 patients at the time it dropped below undetectable levels with the V1 assay.

CONCLUSIONS:

In conclusion, the RT assay is a reliable assay for EBV load in whole blood. Its sensitivity will enable to estimate the kinetics of EBV load and the impact of treatments to control EBV reactivations.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood / Herpesvirus 4, Human / Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / Viral Load / Epstein-Barr Virus Infections / Lymphoproliferative Disorders Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Virol J Journal subject: VIROLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood / Herpesvirus 4, Human / Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / Viral Load / Epstein-Barr Virus Infections / Lymphoproliferative Disorders Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Virol J Journal subject: VIROLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: France