Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automation of Harboe method for the measurement of plasma free hemoglobin.
Chung, Hee-Jung; Chung, Jae-Woo; Yi, Joowon; Hur, Mina; Lee, Tae Hwan; Hwang, Sang-Hyun; Song, Yoon Kyung; Lee, Do Hoon.
Affiliation
  • Chung HJ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Chung JW; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Ilsan, South Korea.
  • Yi J; Samkwang Medical Laboratories, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Hur M; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee TH; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Hwang SH; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Song YK; Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center, Ilsan, South Korea.
  • Lee DH; Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center, Ilsan, South Korea.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 34(6): e23242, 2020 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32154615
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although plasma free hemoglobin (fHb) test is important for assessing intravascular hemolysis, it is still dependent on the gold standard Harboe method using manual and labor-intensive spectrometric measurements at the wavelength of 380-415-450 nm. We established an automated fHb assay using a routine chemistry autoanalyzer that can be tuned to a wavelength of 380-416-450 nm.

METHODS:

The linearity, precision, accuracy, correlation, and sample carryover of fHb measurement using TBA200FRneo method and manual Harboe method were evaluated, respectively. fHb values measured by manual Harboe method were compared with those measured by our new automated TBA200FRneo method.

RESULTS:

fHb measurements were linear in the range of 0.05~38.75 µmol/L by TBA200FRneo and 0.05~9.69 µmol/L by manual Harboe method. Imprecision analysis (%CV) revealed 0.9~2.8% for TBA200FRneo method and 5.3~13.6% for the manual Harboe method. Comparison analysis showed 0.9986 of correlation coefficient (TBA200FRneo = 0.970 × Harboe + 0.12). In analytical accuracy analysis, the manual Harboe method revealed about 4 times higher average total error % (12.2%) than the TBA200FRneo automated method (2.8%). The sample carryover was -0.0016% in TBA200FRneo method and 0.0038% in Harboe method.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the measurement of fHb, the automated TBA200FRneo method showed better performance than the conventional Harboe method. It is expected that the automated fHb assay using the routine chemistry analyzer can replace the gold standard Harboe method which is labor-intensive and need an independent spectrophotometry equipment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spectrophotometry / Blood Chemical Analysis / Hemoglobins Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Journal subject: TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: South Korea

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spectrophotometry / Blood Chemical Analysis / Hemoglobins Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Journal subject: TECNICAS E PROCEDIMENTOS DE LABORATORIO Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: South Korea