Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does the method of administering fluids matter for contrast-induced nephropathy? REMEDIAL III compares LVEDP versus urine flow-guided hydration.
Grines, Cindy L; Marshall, J Jeffrey.
Affiliation
  • Grines CL; Northside Cardiovascular Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Marshall JJ; Northside Cardiovascular Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 95(5): 904-905, 2020 04 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32294325
ABSTRACT
Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing angiographic procedures. Limiting contrast dose and administration of intravenous normal saline appear to be the best approaches to reducing CIN, but the timing, dose, and duration of optimal hydration is poorly understood. The REMEDIAL III trial protocol outlines two different targeted hydration regimens (guided either by continuous measurement of urine output or by initial left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and 700 patients at high risk of CIN will be randomized.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Contrast Media / Acute Kidney Injury Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Contrast Media / Acute Kidney Injury Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States