Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acetabular Revision With Intramedullary and Extramedullary Iliac Fixation for Pelvic Discontinuity.
Frenzel, Stephan; Horas, Konstantin; Rak, Dominik; Boelch, Sebastian Philipp; Rudert, Maximilian; Holzapfel, Boris Michael.
Affiliation
  • Frenzel S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany; Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Horas K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Rak D; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Boelch SP; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Rudert M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
  • Holzapfel BM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany; Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
J Arthroplasty ; 35(12): 3679-3685.e1, 2020 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32694031
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Parallel to the increase in revision hip procedures surgeons face more and more complex anatomical challenges with pelvic discontinuity (PD) being one of the worst-case scenarios. Here we report on our clinical results using an asymmetric acetabular component for the treatment of PD. The implant is armed in a monoblock fashion with an extramedullary iliac flange and provides the possibility to augment it with an intramedullary iliac press-fit stem.

METHODS:

In a single-center retrospective cohort study we analyzed prospectively collected data of 49 patients (35 female, 14 male) suffering from unilateral periprosthetic PD treated with an asymmetric acetabular component between 2009 and 2017. The mean follow-up was 71 months (21-114). Complications were documented and radiographic and functional outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS:

Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a 5-year implant survival of 91% (confidence interval 77%-96%). The 5-year survival with revision for any cause was 87% (CI 74%-94%). The overall revision rate was 16% (n = 8). Two patients required acetabular component revision due to aseptic loosening. Four patients (8%) suffered from periprosthetic infection one patient was treated with a 2-stage revision, and another one with resection arthroplasty. The other 2 patients were treated with debridement, irrigation, and exchange of the mobile parts. Of 6 patients (12%) suffering from hip dislocation, 2 required implantation of a dual mobility acetabular component. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 41 preoperatively to 79 at the latest follow-up (P < .001).

CONCLUSION:

Our findings demonstrate that an asymmetric acetabular component with extramedullary and optional intramedullary iliac fixation is a reliable and safe treatment method for periprosthetic PD resulting in good clinical and radiographic mid-term results.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Austria

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Austria