Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival outcomes after isolated local recurrence of rectal cancer and risk analysis affecting its resectability.
Park, Youn Young; Lee, Jaeim; Han, Yoon Dae; Cho, Min Soo; Hur, Hyuk; Min, Byung Soh; Lee, Kang Young; Oh, Seong Taek; Kim, Nam Kyu.
Affiliation
  • Park YY; Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee J; Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Han YD; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Cho MS; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Hur H; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Min BS; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Lee KY; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Oh ST; Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim NK; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(7): 1470-1480, 2020 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32794188
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the clinical course and prognostic factors after isolated local recurrence (iLR) and to identify the predictive factors for R0 resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 76 patients with iLR who had undergone radical surgery for a primary tumor from 2003 to 2015. RESULTS: The iLR rate was 2.5%. From 76 patients, 39 patients underwent R0 resection for iLR. Multivariate analysis revealed that initial open surgery, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and p/ypT ≥ 3 were poor prognostic factors after iLR as regard to the variables related to the primary tumor; and symptom presence at the time of iLR diagnosis, higher fixity, and no chemotherapy after iLR were associated with shorter overall survival after iLR, and R0 resection of LRRC was the only favorable prognostic factor for progression-free survival after iLR as regard to the variables related to LRRC. Higher tumor level, negative pathologic circumferential margin of the primary tumor, and low fixity of LRRC were favorable factors in achieving R0 resection of LRRC. CONCLUSIONS: Early detection of iLR before symptom development, use of chemotherapy after iLR and R0 resection of LRRC should be considered to improve survival outcomes after iLR.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Surg Oncol Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Korea (South)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Surg Oncol Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: Korea (South)