Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mixture Analyses of Air-sampled Pollen Extracts Can Accurately Differentiate Pollen Taxa.
Klimczak, Leszek J; von Eschenbach, Cordula Ebner; Thompson, Peter M; Buters, Jeroen T M; Mueller, Geoffrey A.
Affiliation
  • Klimczak LJ; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
  • von Eschenbach CE; Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Technische Universität München/Helmholtz Center, Munich, Germany.
  • Thompson PM; Molecular Education, Technology and Research Innovation Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Buters JTM; Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Mueller GA; Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Technische Universität München/Helmholtz Center, Munich, Germany.
Atmos Environ (1994) ; 2432020 Dec 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32922147
ABSTRACT
The daily pollen forecast provides crucial information for allergic patients to avoid exposure to specific pollen. Pollen counts are typically measured with air samplers and analyzed with microscopy by trained experts. In contrast, this study evaluated the effectiveness of identifying the component pollens using the metabolites extracted from an air-sampled pollen mixture. Ambient air-sampled pollen from Munich in 2016 and 2017 was visually identified from reference pollens and extracts were prepared. The extracts were lyophilized, rehydrated in optimal NMR buffers, and filtered to remove large proteins. NMR spectra were analyzed for pollen associated metabolites. Regression and decision-tree based algorithms using the concentration of metabolites, calculated from the NMR spectra outperformed algorithms using the NMR spectra themselves as input data for pollen identification. Categorical prediction algorithms trained for low, medium, high, and very high pollen count groups had accuracies of 74% for the tree, 82% for the grass, and 93% for the weed pollen count. Deep learning models using convolutional neural networks performed better than regression models using NMR spectral input, and were the overall best method in terms of relative error and classification accuracy (86% for tree, 89% for grass, and 93% for weed pollen count). This study demonstrates that NMR spectra of air-sampled pollen extracts can be used in an automated fashion to provide taxa and type-specific measures of the daily pollen count.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Atmos Environ (1994) Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Atmos Environ (1994) Year: 2020 Type: Article