Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Global Public Perceptions of Genomic Data Sharing: What Shapes the Willingness to Donate DNA and Health Data?
Middleton, Anna; Milne, Richard; Almarri, Mohamed A; Anwer, Shamim; Atutornu, Jerome; Baranova, Elena E; Bevan, Paul; Cerezo, Maria; Cong, Yali; Critchley, Christine; Fernow, Josepine; Goodhand, Peter; Hasan, Qurratulain; Hibino, Aiko; Houeland, Gry; Howard, Heidi C; Hussain, S Zakir; Malmgren, Charlotta Ingvoldstad; Izhevskaya, Vera L; Jedrzejak, Aleksandra; Jinhong, Cao; Kimura, Megumi; Kleiderman, Erika; Leach, Brandi; Liu, Keying; Mascalzoni, Deborah; Mendes, Álvaro; Minari, Jusaku; Wang, Nan; Nicol, Dianne; Niemiec, Emilia; Patch, Christine; Pollard, Jack; Prainsack, Barbara; Rivière, Marie; Robarts, Lauren; Roberts, Jonathan; Romano, Virginia; Sheerah, Haytham A; Smith, James; Soulier, Alexandra; Steed, Claire; Stefànsdóttir, Vigdís; Tandre, Cornelia; Thorogood, Adrian; Voigt, Torsten H; West, Anne V; Yoshizawa, Go; Morley, Katherine I.
Affiliation
  • Middleton A; Society and Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK; Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 8PQ, UK. Electronic address: am33@sanger.ac.uk.
  • Milne R; Society and Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK; Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
  • Almarri MA; Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
  • Anwer S; Keynote IAS, New Delhi 110060, India.
  • Atutornu J; Society and Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
  • Baranova EE; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow 119049, Russia.
  • Bevan P; Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
  • Cerezo M; EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
  • Cong Y; Medical Ethics Program, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Critchley C; Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia; Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.
  • Fernow J; Centre for Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 22, Sweden.
  • Goodhand P; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada.
  • Hasan Q; Department of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, Kamineni Hospitals, Hyderabad 500 068, India; SAAZ Genetics, Hyderabad 500033, India.
  • Hibino A; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8560, Japan.
  • Houeland G; Centre for Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 22, Sweden.
  • Howard HC; Centre for Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 22, Sweden; Medical Ethics, Lund Universitet, Lund SE-221 00, Sweden.
  • Hussain SZ; SAAZ Genetics, Hyderabad 500033, India.
  • Malmgren CI; Department of Public Health and Caring Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala 751 22, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Solna 171 76, Sweden.
  • Izhevskaya VL; Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow 115522, Russia.
  • Jedrzejak A; Independent Scholar, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Jinhong C; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China.
  • Kimura M; Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo 186-8603, Japan.
  • Kleiderman E; Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada.
  • Leach B; RAND Europe, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK.
  • Liu K; Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Mascalzoni D; EURAC, Institute of Biomedicine, Bolzano 39100, Italy; Centre for Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 22, Sweden.
  • Mendes Á; UnIGENe and CGPP (Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics), IBMC (Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology), i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde), Universidade do Porto, Porto 4200-135, Portugal.
  • Minari J; Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
  • Wang N; Medical Ethics Program, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Nicol D; Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.
  • Niemiec E; Centre for Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 22, Sweden.
  • Patch C; Society and Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK; Genomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
  • Pollard J; RAND Europe, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK.
  • Prainsack B; Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria; Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
  • Rivière M; Diltec, Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris 75005, France.
  • Robarts L; Society and Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
  • Roberts J; Society and Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
  • Romano V; Centre for Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 22, Sweden; EURAC, Institute of Biomedicine, Bolzano 39100, Italy.
  • Sheerah HA; Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
  • Smith J; Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
  • Soulier A; Centre for Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 22, Sweden.
  • Steed C; Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
  • Stefànsdóttir V; Landspitali, the National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík 101, Iceland.
  • Tandre C; Centre for Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 22, Sweden.
  • Thorogood A; Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada.
  • Voigt TH; Institute of Sociology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen 52062, Germany.
  • West AV; Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
  • Yoshizawa G; Work Research Institute (AFI), Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo 0130, Norway.
  • Morley KI; RAND Europe, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Am J Hum Genet ; 107(4): 743-752, 2020 10 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32946764
ABSTRACT
Analyzing genomic data across populations is central to understanding the role of genetic factors in health and disease. Successful data sharing relies on public support, which requires attention to whether people around the world are willing to donate their data that are then subsequently shared with others for research. However, studies of such public perceptions are geographically limited and do not enable comparison. This paper presents results from a very large public survey on attitudes toward genomic data sharing. Data from 36,268 individuals across 22 countries (gathered in 15 languages) are presented. In general, publics across the world do not appear to be aware of, nor familiar with, the concepts of DNA, genetics, and genomics. Willingness to donate one's DNA and health data for research is relatively low, and trust in the process of data's being shared with multiple users (e.g., doctors, researchers, governments) is also low. Participants were most willing to donate DNA or health information for research when the recipient was specified as a medical doctor and least willing to donate when the recipient was a for-profit researcher. Those who were familiar with genetics and who were trusting of the users asking for data were more likely to be willing to donate. However, less than half of participants trusted more than one potential user of data, although this varied across countries. Genetic information was not uniformly seen as different from other forms of health information, but there was an association between seeing genetic information as special in some way compared to other health data and increased willingness to donate. The global perspective provided by our "Your DNA, Your Say" study is valuable for informing the development of international policy and practice for sharing genomic data. It highlights that the research community not only needs to be worthy of trust by the public, but also urgent steps need to be taken to authentically communicate why genomic research is necessary and how data donation, and subsequent sharing, is integral to this.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genome, Human / Sequence Analysis, DNA / Genomics / Information Dissemination / Trust Type of study: Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia / Europa / Oceania Language: En Journal: Am J Hum Genet Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genome, Human / Sequence Analysis, DNA / Genomics / Information Dissemination / Trust Type of study: Qualitative_research Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia / Europa / Oceania Language: En Journal: Am J Hum Genet Year: 2020 Type: Article