Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery for elderly patients with hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture].
Tian, Z Z; Pang, D; Liu, H N; Zhou, L; Zheng, Y Y.
Affiliation
  • Tian ZZ; Department of General Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.
  • Pang D; School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Liu HN; Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing 100045, China.
  • Zhou L; Department of Orthopedics & Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.
  • Zheng YY; Department of General Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 100(37): 2903-2907, 2020 Oct 13.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32993248
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To explore the clinical effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.

Methods:

A total of 92 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture who received hemiarthroplasty from July 2018 to December 2018 in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital were enrolled in this study. The average age of the participants was (75±6) years, including 31 males and 61 females, and 72(78.3%) of the patients complicated with comorbidity. According to the perioperative management method, the patients were divided into the observational group (47 cases with ERAS) and the control group (45 cases with normal management). The data related to operation, hospitalization, complication and nursing satisfaction were compared between the 2 groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for pain evaluation. The Harris scores for hip joint and EQ-5D index scores were applied to evaluate the clinical outcomes. The follow-up were performed periodically for 3 months. The measurement data in accordance with normal distribution and homogeneity of variance were compared with t test.

Results:

All the surgeries completed successfully and no patient died during perioperative period. Compared with the control group, the operation rate in 48 hours (χ(2)=17.781, P<0.01), bed days (Z=-4.987, P<0.01), and medical costs (Z=-4.315, P<0.01) favored that in the observational group. The incidence of complication and nursing satisfaction showed no significant difference between the two groups (31.1% vs 14.9%, 86.7% vs 95.7%, χ(2)=3.432, 1.380, both P>0.05). The perioperative VAS score was lower in the observational group. The Harris scores were higher in the observational group after 1 months (t=4.458, P<0.01), however the quality of life for 2 groups was similar at all time points (t=1.293, 1.227, both P>0.05).

Conclusion:

ERAS can improve hip function and reduce the hospital stays and medical costs for patients underwent HA operation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Femoral Neck Fractures / Hemiarthroplasty Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: Zh Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Femoral Neck Fractures / Hemiarthroplasty Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: Zh Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: China