Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery.
Miller, Andrew S; Boyce, Kathryn; Box, Benjamin; Clarke, Matthew D; Duff, Sarah E; Foley, Niamh M; Guy, Richard J; Massey, Lisa H; Ramsay, George; Slade, Dominic A J; Stephenson, James A; Tozer, Phil J; Wright, Danette.
Affiliation
  • Miller AS; Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Boyce K; Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK.
  • Box B; Northumbria Healthcare Foundation NHS Trust, North Shields, UK.
  • Clarke MD; South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.
  • Duff SE; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Foley NM; Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
  • Guy RJ; Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Wirral, UK.
  • Massey LH; Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK.
  • Ramsay G; Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Slade DAJ; Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
  • Stephenson JA; University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Tozer PJ; St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London, Harrow, UK.
  • Wright D; Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Colorectal Dis ; 23(2): 476-547, 2021 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33470518
ABSTRACT

AIM:

There is a requirement for an expansive and up to date review of the management of emergency colorectal conditions seen in adults. The primary objective is to provide detailed evidence-based guidelines for the target audience of general and colorectal surgeons who are responsible for an adult population and who practise in Great Britain and Ireland.

METHODS:

Surgeons who are elected members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Emergency Surgery Subcommittee were invited to contribute various sections to the guidelines. They were directed to produce a pathology-based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence-based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after two votes were included in the guidelines.

RESULTS:

All aspects of care (excluding abdominal trauma) for emergency colorectal conditions have been included along with 122 recommendations for management.

CONCLUSION:

These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence-based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of emergency colorectal conditions and should serve as practical text for clinicians managing colorectal conditions in the emergency setting.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Colorectal Surgery Type of study: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Colorectal Surgery Type of study: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom