Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival and reasons for revision of the uncemented Symax hip stem: A Dutch Arthroplasty Register study.
Kruijntjens, Dennis S M G; van Kuijk, Sander M J; van Steenbergen, Liza N; Jutten, Liesbeth M C; Arts, J J Chris; Ten Broeke, René H M.
Affiliation
  • Kruijntjens DSMG; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research School Caphri, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van Kuijk SMJ; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van Steenbergen LN; Dutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten), 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
  • Jutten LMC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research School Caphri, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Arts JJC; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research School Caphri, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Ten Broeke RHM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research School Caphri, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0248483, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711061
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Previous studies have already shown early proximal ingrowth, fast osseous integration, and a stable fit of the uncemented Symax hip stem, with excellent clinical and radiographic performance. Aims were to evaluate cumulative revision rates and reasons for revision of the Symax hip stem using Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) data and to assess possible associations between patient characteristics and revision rate of the Symax hip stem. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

All total hip arthroplasties with the uncemented Symax hip stem registered in the LROI between 2007 and 2017 were included (n = 5,013). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess the cumulative 1, 5 and 7-year revision percentages. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to assess the association between patient and procedural characteristics, and revision arthroplasty of the stem.

RESULTS:

Cumulative 1, 5, and 7-year revision rates (with 95% confidence interval (CI)) for revision of any component were 1.5% (CI 1.2%-1.8%), 3.2% (CI 2.7%-3.7%), and 3.8% (CI 3.1%-4.4%) respectively. Cumulative 1, 5, and 7-year stem revision rates of the Symax hip stem were 0.9% (CI 0.6%-1.1%), 1.5% (CI 1.1%-1.9%), and 1.7% (CI 1.3%-2.1%) respectively. Periprosthetic fractures (n = 35) and loosening of the stem (n = 30) were the most common reasons for revision of the stem. Revision of the stem was associated with acute fracture as primary diagnosis (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.4 (CI 1.3-4.3)), or history of a previous surgery to the affected hip (HR 2.7 (CI 1.4-5.2)).

CONCLUSION:

This population-based registry study shows revision rates for the Symax hip stem comparable to those for best performing uncemented total hip arthroplasties in the Netherlands. Primary diagnosis of an acute fracture, and history of previous surgery on the affected hip, were significantly associated risk factors for revision of the Symax hip stem, and we discourage the use of the Symax hip stem in these patients.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prosthesis Failure / Registries / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Periprosthetic Fractures / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prosthesis Failure / Registries / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Periprosthetic Fractures / Hip Prosthesis Type of study: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands