Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determination of Immediate-loaded Single Implants' Stability with Periotest.
Jagadeesh, Kyatsandra N; Kumar, Sudhanshu; Parihar, Anuj Singh; Kaur, Jasvinder; Kumar, Randhir; Kumar, Kunal.
Affiliation
  • Jagadeesh KN; Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Sree Siddhartha Dental College, Sree Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India.
  • Kumar S; Department of Dentistry, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India.
  • Parihar AS; Department of Periodontics, People's Dental Academy, People's University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, Phone: +91 8827047003, e-mail: dr.anujparihar@gmail.com.
  • Kaur J; Department of Prosthodontics, Swami Devi Dayal Dental College, Barwala, Haryana, India.
  • Kumar R; Department of Periodontics, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
  • Kumar K; Department of Dentistry, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 21(11): 1245-1248, 2020 Nov 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33850070
ABSTRACT
AIM AND

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to determine the stability of immediate-loaded single implants with periotest. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In this in vivo study, dental implants with a length ranging from 10 to 13 mm and diameter of 3.0-4.2 mm were utilized. Stability of dental implant was evaluated using the Periotest® M handheld device before loading, at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS:

Implants 11.5 mm in length had the highest mean periotest value (0) after placement, whereas 10 mm-long implant had a value of -0.31 and 13 mm had a value of -0.48. After 1 month, 10 mm had a value of 1.23, 11.5 mm had a value of -0.32, and 13.0 mm had a value of -0.24. After 6 months, 10 mm had a value of 1.78, 11.5 mm had a value of -0.4, and 13.0 mm had a value of -0.41. After 1 year, 10 mm had a value of -0.54, 11.5 mm had a value of -0.51, and 13.0 mm had a value of -0.48. There was an unconstructive relationship between implant length and the average periotest score. There was also an unconstructive association between the implant diameter and the mean periotest value.

CONCLUSION:

The implant with long and greatest diameter had higher stability. Periotest can be used to determine dental implant stability. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

Periotest is useful in determining dental implant stability. Large-scale studies may be helpful in obtaining useful results.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Implants Language: En Journal: J Contemp Dent Pract Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: India
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Implants Language: En Journal: J Contemp Dent Pract Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: India