Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A survey exploring women's use of mobile apps in labour in the United Kingdom.
Lovell, Holly; Harris, James Matthew.
Affiliation
  • Lovell H; Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care Faculty James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, England, United Kingdom. Electronic address: holly.lovell@gstt.nhs.uk.
  • Harris JM; Women's Services, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, England, United Kingdom.
Midwifery ; 100: 103041, 2021 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34048942
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine women's use of mobile apps in labour in the United Kingdom.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional online survey. Descriptive analysis on women's reported use of apps whilst in labour, using multiple choice questions to explore frequency of app use and reasons and experiences of using apps. Thematic analysis of a free text question explored experiences and opinions regarding app use in labour.

SETTING:

Social media. Two groups from Facebook.com and one group from Babycentre.co.uk

PARTICIPANTS:

A total of 749 women, surveyed over a one month period. MEASUREMENTS Demographics of women; characteristics of women's labours and birth; access to smartphones and app; rates of app use in labour and reasons for use; experiences of app use in labour.

FINDINGS:

A total of 851 women responded, of which 749 were eligible. 431 (57.5%) reporting using an app in labour. No associations were found between age, ethnicity, education or mode of delivery and app use. Women who used an app were significantly more likely to have gone into labour spontaneously, and those who delivered between 40- 40+6 weeks gestation were significantly more likely to use an app. The majority of apps were used to monitor contractions, and most women found the apps useful and would recommend the apps they used. There was no association between number of labour ward attendances and app use, however women who used an app were significantly more likely to be admitted in more advanced labour. Qualitative comments found apps were viewed both as barriers and facilitators to the labour experience. KEY

CONCLUSIONS:

A large number of women are using apps in labour, with potential benefits. There is no consensus from women on the experience of app use. The use of technology should not replace an individual assessment on a laboring women however. Although national bodies support the use of apps in maternity, there is currently insufficient evidence and regulation to support the safety and efficacy of these recommendations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Those working in maternity services should be aware many women are using apps in labour, and can consider this information as part of their assessment. Further work is needed to explore what women want from an app in labour, and to investigate whether app use can benefit a woman's experience of labour and improve outcomes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Labor, Obstetric / Mobile Applications Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Midwifery Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Labor, Obstetric / Mobile Applications Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Midwifery Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA Year: 2021 Type: Article