Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How to implement a PEWS in a resource-limited setting: A quantitative analysis of the bedside-PEWS implementation in a hospital in northeast Brazil.
van der Fluit, Karin S; Boom, Matthijs C; Brandão, Marlon B; Lopes, Gabriel D; Barreto, Paula G; Leite, Deborah C F; Gurgel, Ricardo Q.
Affiliation
  • van der Fluit KS; Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Boom MC; Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Brandão MB; Department of Pediatrics, Hospital e Maternidade Santa Isabel, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Lopes GD; Professional Graduate Program in Health Technological Management and Innovation, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Barreto PG; Department of Pediatrics, Medicine Faculty, Tiradentes University, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Leite DCF; Department of Pediatrics, Medicine Faculty, Tiradentes University, Aracaju, Brazil.
  • Gurgel RQ; Department of Pediatrics, Medicine Faculty, Tiradentes University, Aracaju, Brazil.
Trop Med Int Health ; 26(10): 1240-1247, 2021 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34192384
OBJECTIVES: Quantitative analysis of the implementation of the bedside paediatric early warning system (B-PEWS) in a resource-limited setting. The B-PEWS serves to pre-emptively identify hospitalised children who are at risk for cardiopulmonary arrest and subsequently to provide critical care in time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review through the medical data records of patients after discharge from the paediatric ward of a philanthropic hospital in Brazil. Nurses' performance using the system was measured with various parameters. RESULTS: A total of 499 patients were included, and a total of 8024 scores were checked. During the 21-week research period, the implementation rate increased significantly from 66.5% (SD 26.0) in Period 1 to 93.1% (SD 16.6) in Period 2. The number of scores that resulted in a correct total score went from 7.5% in Period 1 to 32.2% in Period 2, p < 0.001. There was an improvement in the correct choice of age group between the two periods (from 32.2% to 53.4%). There was no difference in the mean admission time of patients in the two periods: in the first period 4.8 days (SD 2.9) and in the second period 4.8 days (SD 4.1). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to implement a PEWS in resource-limited settings while achieving high implementation rates. However, this is a time- and energy-consuming process. Having an active and involved team that is responsible for implementation is key for a successful implementation. Factors that likely hindered implementation were a large change in workflow for the nursing staff, non-native speakers as main investigators.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Status Indicators / Hospitals / Monitoring, Physiologic Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Trop Med Int Health Journal subject: MEDICINA TROPICAL / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Status Indicators / Hospitals / Monitoring, Physiologic Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Trop Med Int Health Journal subject: MEDICINA TROPICAL / SAUDE PUBLICA Year: 2021 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands