Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic vacuum therapy for the management of upper GI leaks and perforations: a multicenter retrospective study of factors associated with treatment failure (with video).
Jung, Da Hyun; Huh, Cheal Wung; Min, Yang Won; Park, Jun Chul.
Affiliation
  • Jung DH; Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Huh CW; Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Min YW; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park JC; Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 95(2): 281-290, 2022 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34555386
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

The optimal management of upper GI (UGI) leaks and perforations remains controversial. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is a new alternative endoscopic treatment that has recently shown a high rate of successful closure of UGI leaks and perforations. However, only few reports have been made on the factors that affect clinical success rates.

METHODS:

Four referral hospitals participated in this retrospective multicenter study. Between September 2015 and February 2020, 119 patients who underwent EVT for a UGI perforation or leak were included. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of EVT and the factors associated with EVT failure. Neoadjuvant treatments included chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy before surgery, and the intraluminal method meant that the sponge was placed directly onto the defect within the lumen of UGI tract.

RESULTS:

Among 119 patients, 84 showed clinical success (70.6%). Eighty-nine patients (74.8%) underwent EVT as primary therapy and 30 patients as rescue therapy. On multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant treatment and the intraluminal method were significant independent risk factors for EVT failure. During the follow-up period (median, 8.46 months), stenosis occurred in 22 patients (18.5%). The overall survival rate of the EVT success group was significantly higher than that of the EVT failure group. Twenty-two patients died because of non-EVT-related causes, and 7 patients died because of leakage-related adverse events. No death was caused by the EVT itself.

CONCLUSIONS:

EVT is a promising treatment method for UGI leaks and perforations. Further studies are needed to establish the indications for successful EVT.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Upper Gastrointestinal Tract / Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Upper Gastrointestinal Tract / Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Year: 2022 Type: Article