Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fully automated quality control of rigid and affine registrations of T1w and T2w MRI in big data using machine learning.
Tummala, Sudhakar; Thadikemalla, Venkata Sainath Gupta; Kreilkamp, Barbara A K; Dam, Erik B; Focke, Niels K.
Affiliation
  • Tummala S; Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM University-AP, Andhra Pradesh, India; Clinic for Neurology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany. Electronic address: sudhakar.t@srmap.edu.in.
  • Thadikemalla VSG; Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Velagapudi Ramakrishna Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Kreilkamp BAK; Clinic for Neurology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Dam EB; Machine Learning Section, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Focke NK; Clinic for Neurology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Comput Biol Med ; 139: 104997, 2021 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34753079
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based morphometry and relaxometry are proven methods for the structural assessment of the human brain in several neurological disorders. These procedures are generally based on T1-weighted (T1w) and/or T2-weighted (T2w) MRI scans, and rigid and affine registrations to a standard template(s) are essential steps in such studies. Therefore, a fully automatic quality control (QC) of these registrations is necessary in big data scenarios to ensure that they are suitable for subsequent processing.

METHOD:

A supervised machine learning (ML) framework is proposed by computing similarity metrics such as normalized cross-correlation, normalized mutual information, and correlation ratio locally. We have used these as candidate features for cross-validation and testing of different ML classifiers. For 5-fold repeated stratified grid search cross-validation, 400 correctly aligned, 2000 randomly generated misaligned images were used from the human connectome project young adult (HCP-YA) dataset. To test the cross-validated models, the datasets from autism brain imaging data exchange (ABIDE I) and information eXtraction from images (IXI) were used.

RESULTS:

The ensemble classifiers, random forest, and AdaBoost yielded best performance with F1-scores, balanced accuracies, and Matthews correlation coefficients in the range of 0.95-1.00 during cross-validation. The predictive accuracies reached 0.99 on the Test set #1 (ABIDE I), 0.99 without and 0.96 with noise on Test set #2 (IXI, stratified w.r.t scanner vendor and field strength).

CONCLUSIONS:

The cross-validated and tested ML models could be used for QC of both T1w and T2w rigid and affine registrations in large-scale MRI studies.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Big Data Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Comput Biol Med Year: 2021 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Big Data Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Comput Biol Med Year: 2021 Type: Article