Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oral bacterial decontamination using an innovative prototype for photocatalytic disinfection.
Souza, Matheus Albino; Corralo, Daniela Jorge; Gabrielli, Ezequiel Santin; Figueiredo, José Antônio Poli; Cohen, Stephen; Wolff, Mark; Steier, Liviu.
Affiliation
  • Souza MA; School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Building A7, Suite 2, São JoséPasso Fundo, RS, 99052-900, Brazil. matheus292@yahoo.com.br.
  • Corralo DJ; School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Building A7, Suite 2, São JoséPasso Fundo, RS, 99052-900, Brazil.
  • Gabrielli ES; School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Building A7, Suite 2, São JoséPasso Fundo, RS, 99052-900, Brazil.
  • Figueiredo JAP; School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Cohen S; School of Dentistry, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Wolff M; School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Steier L; School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Clin Oral Investig ; 26(3): 3005-3010, 2022 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34775518
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a prototype photocatalytic device for bacterial decontaminations of the oral cavity.

METHODS:

Sixty-four subjects (18-65) were selected and randomly assigned to eight groups (n = 8), according to oral disinfection protocol (G1) distilled water (control); (G2) 1.5% hydrogen peroxide (HP); (G3) 3.0% HP; (G4) 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX); (G5) Germinator; (G6) 1.5% HP + Germinator; (G7) 3.0%HP + Germinator; (G8) 0.12% CHX + Germinator. Stimulated saliva was collected before and after a 3-min mouthwash and/or Germinator application. The patients were kept relaxed and retained saliva 5-10 min, spitting out into the tube for 3 min. The percentage bacterial reduction was checked by counting the colony-forming units (CFUs) after culturing on blood agar plates. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 5%) for statistical significance.

RESULTS:

The highest bacterial reduction was observed in groups 3 (3.0% HP), 6 (1.5% HP + Germinator), and 7 (3.0% + Germinator), with no statistically significant difference between them (p > 0.05). Groups 6 (1.5% HP + Germinator) and 8 (0.12% CHX + Germinator) showed higher bacterial reduction than groups 2 (1.5% HP) and 4 (0.12% CHX) (p < 0.05). Finally, group 5 (Germinator) showed higher bacterial reduction than control group (DW) and group 4 (0.12% CHX) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The photocatalytic disinfection was effective against oral bacteria and improved the antimicrobial action of 1.5% HP and 0.12%. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

The photocatalytic disinfection can be an alternative protocol to provide the oral decontamination.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decontamination / Disinfection Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decontamination / Disinfection Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil