Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the cost and medical resource use outcomes associated with nasal glucagon versus injectable glucagon for treatment of severe hypoglycemia in people with diabetes in Canada: a modeling analysis.
Yale, Jean-François; Osumili, Beatrice; Mitchell, Beth D; Hunt, Barnaby; Sohi, Gurjeev; Jeddi, Mark; Mojdami, Donna; Valentine, William J.
Affiliation
  • Yale JF; Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
  • Osumili B; Eli Lilly and Company Limited, Bracknell, UK.
  • Mitchell BD; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Hunt B; Ossian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Sohi G; Eisai Limited, Mississauga, Canada.
  • Jeddi M; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Mojdami D; Eli Lilly Canada Inc., Toronto, Canada.
  • Valentine WJ; Ossian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland.
J Med Econ ; 25(1): 238-248, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35094622
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Treatments for severe hypoglycemia aim to restore blood glucose through successful administration of rescue therapy, and choosing the most effective and cost-effective option will improve outcomes for patients and may reduce costs for healthcare payers. The present analysis aimed to compare costs and use of medical services with nasal glucagon and injectable glucagon in people with type 1 and 2 diabetes in Canada when used to treat severe hypoglycemic events when impaired consciousness precludes treatment with oral carbohydrates using an economic model, based on differences in the frequency of successful administration of the two interventions.

METHODS:

A decision tree model was prepared in Microsoft Excel to project outcomes with nasal glucagon and injectable glucagon. The model structure reflected real-world decision-making and treatment outcomes, based on Canada-specific sources. The model captured the use of glucagon, emergency medical services (EMS), emergency room, inpatient stay, and follow-up care. Costs were accounted for in 2019 Canadian dollars (CAD).

RESULTS:

Nasal glucagon was associated with reduced use of all medical services compared with injectable glucagon. EMS call outs were projected to be reduced by 45%, emergency room treatments by 52%, and inpatient stays by 13%. Use of nasal glucagon was associated with reduced direct, indirect, and combined costs of CAD 1,249, CAD 460, and CAD 1,709 per severe hypoglycemic event, respectively, due to avoided EMS call outs and hospital costs, resulting from a higher proportion of successful administrations.

CONCLUSIONS:

When a patient with type 1 or type 2 diabetes is being treated for a severe hypoglycemic event when impaired consciousness precludes treatment with oral carbohydrate, use of nasal glucagon was projected to be dominant versus injectable glucagon in Canada reducing costs and use of medical services.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Glucagon / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Hypoglycemia Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Med Econ Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Glucagon / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Hypoglycemia Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Med Econ Journal subject: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada