Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of divergent continuous glucose monitoring technologies on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Elbalshy, Mona; Haszard, Jillian; Smith, Hazel; Kuroko, Sarahmarie; Galland, Barbara; Oliver, Nick; Shah, Viral; de Bock, Martin I; Wheeler, Benjamin J.
Affiliation
  • Elbalshy M; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Haszard J; Division of Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Smith H; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Kuroko S; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Galland B; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Oliver N; Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK.
  • Shah V; Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • de Bock MI; Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Wheeler BJ; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Diabet Med ; 39(8): e14854, 2022 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35441743
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) assessing separately and together the effect of the three distinct categories of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems (adjunctive, non-adjunctive and intermittently-scanned CGM [isCGM]), compared with traditional capillary glucose monitoring, on HbA1c and CGM metrics.

METHODS:

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central register of clinical trials were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows randomised controlled trials; participants with type 1 diabetes of any age and insulin regimen; investigating CGM and isCGM compared with traditional capillary glucose monitoring; and reporting glycaemic outcomes of HbA1c and/or time-in-range (TIR). Glycaemic outcomes were extracted post-intervention and expressed as mean differences and 95%CIs between treatment and comparator groups. Results were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Rob2 tool.

RESULTS:

This systematic review was conducted between January and April 2021; it included 22 RCTs (15 adjunctive, 5 non-adjunctive, and 2 isCGM)). The overall analysis of the pooled three categories showed a statistically significant absolute improvement in HbA1c percentage points (mean difference (95% CI) -0.22% [-0.31 to -0.14], I2  = 79%) for intervention compared with comparator and was strongest for adjunctive CGM (-0.26% [-0.36, -0.16]). Overall TIR (absolute change) increased by 5.4% (3.5 to 7.2), I2  = 71% for CGM intervention compared with comparator and was strongest with non-adjunctive CGM (6.0% [2.3, 9.7]).

CONCLUSIONS:

For individuals with T1D, use of CGM was beneficial for impacting glycaemic outcomes including HbA1c, TIR and time-below-range (TBR). Glycaemic improvement appeared greater for TIR for newer non-adjunctive CGM technology.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Diabet Med Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: New Zealand

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Diabet Med Journal subject: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: New Zealand