Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability.
Telles, Luiz Guilherme; Billaut, François; de Souza Ribeiro, Aline; Junqueira, Christian Geórgea; Leitão, Luís; Barreto, Ana Cristina; Panza, Patricia; Vianna, Jeferson Macedo; da Silva Novaes, Jefferson.
Affiliation
  • Telles LG; Physical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil.
  • Billaut F; Estácio de Sá University (UNESA), Rio de Janeiro 20261-063, Brazil.
  • de Souza Ribeiro A; Department of Kinesiology, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
  • Junqueira CG; Physical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, São Pedro 36036-900, Brazil.
  • Leitão L; Volta Redonda University Center, Rio de Janeiro 27240-560, Brazil.
  • Barreto AC; Sciences and Technology Department, Superior School of Education of Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal.
  • Panza P; Life Quality Research Centre, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
  • Vianna JM; Celso Lisboa University Center, Rio de Janeiro 20950-092, Brazil.
  • da Silva Novaes J; Physical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, São Pedro 36036-900, Brazil.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35805313
ABSTRACT

Background:

The application of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) to resistance exercise has attracted some attention, owing to increases in muscle performance. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal occlusion pressure for this procedure. This study compared the acute effects of IPC with high and low pressure of occlusion on upper and lower limb maximal strength and heart rate variability in recreationally trained individuals.

Methods:

Sixteen recreationally trained men (25.3 ± 1.7 years; 78.4 ± 6.2 kg; 176.9 ± 5.4 cm; 25.1 ± 1.5 m2 kg−1) were thoroughly familiarized with one repetition maximum (1 RM) testing in the following exercises bench press (BP), front latissimus pull-down (FLPD), and shoulder press (SP) for upper limbs, and leg press 45º (LP45), hack machine (HM), and Smith Squat (SS) for lower limbs. The 1 RM exercises were then randomly performed on three separate days after a high pressure (220 mmHg, IPChigh) and a low pressure (20 mmHg, IPClow) IPC protocol and after no intervention (control, CON). Heart rate variability was also measured at rest, during and after the entire IPC protocol, and after the exercises.

Results:

Maximal strength was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in both IPChigh and IPClow compared with CON in all upper- and lower-limb exercises. There was no difference between the two experimental conditions. No significant differences were found in the comparison across the different experimental conditions for LFnu, HFnu, LF/HF ratio, and RMSSDms.

Conclusions:

IPC performed with both high and low pressures influenced heart rate variability, which may partly explain the maximal strength enhancement.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ischemic Preconditioning / Resistance Training Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ischemic Preconditioning / Resistance Training Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil