Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Vitamin K antagonist reversal strategies: Systematic review and network meta-analysis from the AABB.
Pagano, Monica B; Foroutan, Farid; Goel, Ruchika; Allen, Elizabeth S; Cushing, Melissa M; Garcia, David A; Hopkins, Courtney K; Klein, Kimberly; Raval, Jay S; Cohn, Claudia S.
Affiliation
  • Pagano MB; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Foroutan F; Ted Rogers Center for Heart Research, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Goel R; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Allen ES; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Cushing MM; ImpactLife Blood Center and Simmons Cancer Institute and SIU School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA.
  • Garcia DA; Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Hopkins CK; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Klein K; Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Raval JS; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Cohn CS; Medical Director Deparment, Vitalant, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Transfusion ; 62(8): 1652-1661, 2022 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35834523
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anticoagulation requires urgent reversal in cases of life-threatening bleeding or invasive procedures. STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

Network meta-analysis for comparing the safety and efficacy of warfarin reversal strategies including plasma and prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs).

RESULTS:

Seven studies including 594 subjects using reversal agents plasma, 3-factor-PCC (Uman Complex and Konyne), and 4-factor-PCC (Beriplex/KCentra, Octaplex, and Cofact) met inclusion criteria. Compared with plasma, patients receiving Cofact probably have a higher rate of international normalized ratio (INR) correction (risk difference [RD] 499 more per 1000 patients, 95% confidence interval [CI], 176-761, low certainty[LC]); higher reversal of bleeding (323 more per 1000 patients, 11-344 more, LC); and fewer transfusion requirements (0.96 fewer units, 1.65-0.27 fewer, LC). Patients receiving Beriplex/KCentra probably have a higher rate of INR correction (476 more per 1000 patients, 332-609 more, LC); higher reversal of bleeding (127 more per 1000 patients, 43 fewer to 236 more); and similar transfusion requirements (0.01 fewer units, 0.31 fewer to 0.28 more, high/moderate certainty). Patients receiving Octaplex probably have a higher rate of INR correction (RD 579 more per 1000 patients, 189-825 more, LC).

CONCLUSIONS:

PCCs probably provide an advantage in INR reversal compared to plasma. There was no added risk of adverse events with PCCs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Coagulation Factors / Anticoagulants Type of study: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Transfusion Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Coagulation Factors / Anticoagulants Type of study: Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Transfusion Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States