Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Remote Dispensing of Emergency Release Red Blood Cells.
Whiteneck, Stephanie A; Lueckel, Stephanie; Valente, Jonathan H; King, Karen A; Sweeney, Joseph D.
Affiliation
  • Whiteneck SA; Department of Coagulation and Transfusion Medicine, Lifespan Academic Medical Center and the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Lueckel S; Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Lifespan Academic Medical Center and the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Valente JH; Department of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Lifespan Academic Medical Center and the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • King KA; Department of Coagulation and Transfusion Medicine, Lifespan Academic Medical Center and the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Sweeney JD; Department of Coagulation and Transfusion Medicine, Lifespan Academic Medical Center and the Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 158(4): 537-545, 2022 10 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35942931
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Patients with acute bleeding are frequently transfused with emergency release (ER) group O RBCs. This practice has been reported to be safe with a low rate of acute hemolytic transfusion reactions (AHRs).

METHODS:

Records of patients who received ER RBCs over a 30-month period were examined at our hospitals. During this period, satellite refrigerators were on site in the emergency department (ED), which were electronically connected to the blood bank (electronically connected satellite refrigerator [ECSR]). Nurses accessing the refrigerator were required to give patient identification information, when known, prior to removal of the ER RBCs, allowing technologists the opportunity to check for previous serologic records and communicate directly with the ED if a serologic incompatibility was potentially present.

RESULTS:

In total, 935 patients were transfused with 1,847 units of ER RBCs. Thirty of these patients had a current (22/30) or historic (8/30) antibody. In 15 cases, incompatible RBCs were interdicted. In six cases, the transfusion was considered urgent, and an AHR occurred in four of these six (overall 0.4%), including one fatal AHR due to anti-KEL1.

CONCLUSIONS:

Use of KEL1-negative RBCs and ECSR merits consideration as approaches to mitigate the occurrence of ER RBC-associated AHRs.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Erythrocyte Transfusion / Transfusion Reaction Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Erythrocyte Transfusion / Transfusion Reaction Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States