Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
E pluribus unum: prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology crowdsourced initiative for multiobserver segmentation.
Lin, Diana; Wahid, Kareem A; Nelms, Benjamin E; He, Renjie; Naser, Mohammed A; Duke, Simon; Sherer, Michael V; Christodouleas, John P; Mohamed, Abdallah S R; Cislo, Michael; Murphy, James D; Fuller, Clifton D; Gillespie, Erin F.
Affiliation
  • Lin D; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, New York, United States.
  • Wahid KA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Nelms BE; Canis Lupus, LLC, Merrimac, Wisconsin, United States.
  • He R; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Naser MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Duke S; Cambridge University Hospitals, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Sherer MV; University of California San Diego, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, La Jolla, California, United States.
  • Christodouleas JP; The University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Mohamed ASR; Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Cislo M; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Murphy JD; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, New York, United States.
  • Fuller CD; University of California San Diego, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, La Jolla, California, United States.
  • Gillespie EF; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, Texas, United States.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 10(Suppl 1): S11903, 2023 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36761036
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology (C3RO) is a crowdsourced challenge engaging radiation oncologists across various expertise levels in segmentation. An obstacle to artificial intelligence (AI) development is the paucity of multiexpert datasets; consequently, we sought to characterize whether aggregate segmentations generated from multiple nonexperts could meet or exceed recognized expert agreement.

Approach:

Participants who contoured ≥ 1 region of interest (ROI) for the breast, sarcoma, head and neck (H&N), gynecologic (GYN), or gastrointestinal (GI) cases were identified as a nonexpert or recognized expert. Cohort-specific ROIs were combined into single simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) consensus segmentations. STAPLE nonexpert ROIs were evaluated against STAPLE expert contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The expert interobserver DSC ( IODSC expert ) was calculated as an acceptability threshold between STAPLE nonexpert and STAPLE expert . To determine the number of nonexperts required to match the IODSC expert for each ROI, a single consensus contour was generated using variable numbers of nonexperts and then compared to the IODSC expert .

Results:

For all cases, the DSC values for STAPLE nonexpert versus STAPLE expert were higher than comparator expert IODSC expert for most ROIs. The minimum number of nonexpert segmentations needed for a consensus ROI to achieve IODSC expert acceptability criteria ranged between 2 and 4 for breast, 3 and 5 for sarcoma, 3 and 5 for H&N, 3 and 5 for GYN, and 3 for GI.

Conclusions:

Multiple nonexpert-generated consensus ROIs met or exceeded expert-derived acceptability thresholds. Five nonexperts could potentially generate consensus segmentations for most ROIs with performance approximating experts, suggesting nonexpert segmentations as feasible cost-effective AI inputs.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States