Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting severe pain after major surgery: a secondary analysis of the Peri-operative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) dataset.
Armstrong, R A; Fayaz, A; Manning, G L P; Moonesinghe, S R; Oliver, C M.
Affiliation
  • Armstrong RA; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Fayaz A; Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Manning GLP; Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Moonesinghe SR; Central London School of Anaesthesia, London, UK.
  • Oliver CM; Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anaesthesia ; 78(7): 840-852, 2023 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36862937
ABSTRACT
Acute postoperative pain is common, distressing and associated with increased morbidity. Targeted interventions can prevent its development. We aimed to develop and internally validate a predictive tool to pre-emptively identify patients at risk of severe pain following major surgery. We analysed data from the UK Peri-operative Quality Improvement Programme to develop and validate a logistic regression model to predict severe pain on the first postoperative day using pre-operative variables. Secondary analyses included the use of peri-operative variables. Data from 17,079 patients undergoing major surgery were included. Severe pain was reported by 3140 (18.4%) patients; this was more prevalent in females, patients with cancer or insulin-dependent diabetes, current smokers and in those taking baseline opioids. Our final model included 25 pre-operative predictors with an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.66 and good calibration (mean absolute error 0.005, p = 0.35). Decision-curve analysis suggested an optimal cut-off value of 20-30% predicted risk to identify high-risk individuals. Potentially modifiable risk factors included smoking status and patient-reported measures of psychological well-being. Non-modifiable factors included demographic and surgical factors. Discrimination was improved by the addition of intra-operative variables (likelihood ratio χ2 496.5, p < 0.001) but not by the addition of baseline opioid data. On internal validation, our pre-operative prediction model was well calibrated but discrimination was moderate. Performance was improved with the inclusion of peri-operative covariates suggesting pre-operative variables alone are not sufficient to adequately predict postoperative pain.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain, Postoperative / Quality Improvement Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Anaesthesia Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain, Postoperative / Quality Improvement Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Anaesthesia Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom