Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation, Lymph Node Dissection, or Both: Management of Lymph Node Micrometastases from Merkel Cell Carcinoma.
Ma, Kevin L; Sharon, Cimarron E; Tortorello, Gabriella N; Perry, Nikhita J; Keele, Luke J; Lukens, John N; Karakousis, Giorgos C; Miura, John T.
Affiliation
  • Ma KL; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Sharon CE; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Tortorello GN; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Perry NJ; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Keele LJ; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lukens JN; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Karakousis GC; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. giorgos.karakousis@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
  • Miura JT; Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(7): 4345-4355, 2023 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37106277
BACKGROUND: Regional lymph node micrometastases from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) can be treated with completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and/or radiation therapy (RT). It is unclear how these options compare in terms of survival benefits for patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from years 2012-2019 of the National Cancer Database. Patients with MCC and clinically negative, but pathologically positive, lymph node metastases who received RT to and/or CLND of the regional lymph node basin were included. Inverse probability weight balancing was performed using covariates followed by Cox proportional hazards modeling for survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 962 patients were included [median (interquartile range) age, 74 (67-80) years, 662 (68.8%) male patients, 926 (96.3%) white patients]. The majority (63%, n = 606) had a CLND only, while 18% (n = 173) had RT only, and 19% (n = 183) had both CLND and RT. From 2016 to 2019, usage of RT only increased from 10% to 31.8%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not associated with survival [RT versus CLND, hazard ratio (HR) 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.621-1.142, p = 0.269, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.029, 95% CI 0.775-1.367, p = 0.844]. This persisted after balancing weights (RT versus CLND, HR 0.837, 95% CI 0.614-1.142, p = 0.262, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.085, 95% CI 0.801-1.470, p = 0.599). CONCLUSIONS: The usage of RT for nodal micrometastasis in MCC is increasing as compared with CLND. This strategy appears to be safe, with no significant difference in survival outcomes.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Merkel Cell Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Skin Neoplasms / Carcinoma, Merkel Cell Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States