Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Practice Patterns of American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons for the Management of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Duncan, Stephen T; Schwarzkopf, Ran; Seyler, Thorsten M; Landy, David C.
Affiliation
  • Duncan ST; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Schwarzkopf R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU, New York, New York.
  • Seyler TM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Landy DC; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
J Arthroplasty ; 38(11): 2441-2446, 2023 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37142069
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has considerable variation. In order to better capture current preferences for the management of PJI, this study sought to poll the current members of American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) first to characterize the distribution of practice patterns.

METHODS:

There were 32 questions in an online survey distributed to members of AAHKS. The questions were multiple choice regarding the management of PJI for TKA. There were 844 out of 2,752 members who completed the survey (response rate of 31%).

RESULTS:

Most of the members were in private practice (50%) compared to 28% being in an academic setting. On average, members were performing between 6 to 20 PJI cases per year. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty was performed in over 75% of the cases with either a cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) primary femoral component used in over 50% of the cases and 62% using an all-polyethylene tibial implant. Most of the members were using vancomycin and tobramycin. Typically, 2 to 3 grams of antibiotics were added per bag of cement regardless of the cement type. When indicated, amphotericin was the most often-used antifungal. Post-operative management had major variability with range of motion, brace use, and weight-bearing restrictions.

CONCLUSION:

There was variability in the responses from the members of AAHKS, but there was a preference toward performing a two-stage exchange arthroplasty with an articulating spacer using a metal femoral component and an all-polyethylene liner.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthritis, Infectious / Prosthesis-Related Infections / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Surgeons Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Arthritis, Infectious / Prosthesis-Related Infections / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Surgeons Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Arthroplasty Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2023 Type: Article