Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of Palonosetron, 1-Day Dexamethasone, and Aprepitant in Patients Undergoing Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy.
Hayashi, Toshinobu; Shimokawa, Mototsugu; Matsuo, Koichi; Uchiyama, Masanobu; Kawada, Kei; Nakano, Takafumi; Egawa, Takashi.
Affiliation
  • Hayashi T; Department of Comprehensive Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Shimokawa M; Department of Biostatistics, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan.
  • Matsuo K; Department of Comprehensive Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Uchiyama M; Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Kawada K; Department of Pharmacy, Kochi Medical School Hospital City, Nankoku, Japan.
  • Nakano T; Department of Comprehensive Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Egawa T; Department of Comprehensive Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Oncology ; 101(9): 584-590, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37276851
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing strategy with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist (5HT3RA) and aprepitant (APR), as triplet antiemetic prophylaxis, is associated with poor control of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving carboplatin (CBDCA)-based chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether using palonosetron (PALO) as a 5HT3RA provides superior control with CINV than first-generation (1st) 5HT3RA in triplet antiemetic prophylaxis with a DEX-sparing strategy.

METHODS:

Pooled patient-level data from a nationwide, multicenter, and prospective observational study were analyzed to compare the incidence of CINV between patients administered PALO and 1st 5HT3RA in combination with 1-day DEX and APR.

RESULTS:

No significant differences were observed in the incidence of CINV, pattern of CINV, or severity of nausea by type of 5HT3RA in triplet antiemetic prophylaxis with DEX-sparing strategy. In both groups, the incidence of nausea gradually increased from day 3, peaked on day 4 or 5, and then declined slowly. The visual analog scale scores in the delayed phase remained high throughout the 7-day observation period.

CONCLUSION:

Careful patient selection and symptom monitoring are needed when implementing the DEX-sparing strategy in triplet antiemetic prophylaxis for patients undergoing CBDCA-based chemotherapy. Furthermore, additional strategies may be needed to achieve better control of delayed CINV.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antiemetics / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Oncology Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Antiemetics / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Oncology Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan